[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
- To: xymon (at) xymon.com
- Subject: Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
- From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:56:47 +0100
- Cc: "Epp, Matthew Mr CTR USA USA" <matthew.epp (at) us.army.mil>
- References: <AANLkTim8ScYyOPJu3u2d=Yy2Vd05rCMEh1=ccvJUhemT (at) mail.gmail.com> <1287418781.11596.11.camel (at) mcdonalddj-dc.austin-energy.net> <4CBC814B.9050800 (at) us.army.mil>
- User-agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33.7-desktop-2mnb; KDE/4.4.3; x86_64; ; )
On Monday, 18 October 2010 18:18:03 Epp, Matthew Mr CTR USA USA wrote:
> Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 20:56 +0530, rigved sharma wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> sorry for the earlier mail..i want to know which one is good for xymon
> >> for network devices monitoring..devmon/mrtg.
> >> Please help.
> >
> > It's a religious question. I use mrtg because it supports snmp-v3, I
> > already have my templates built, and I can live with the hack that is
> > bb-mrtg.pl. Other people like devmon, but I haven't been able to test
> > it because of the snmp-v3 issue.
>
> I use devmon for some device polling, although it takes some time writing
> templates for devices.
For the equivalent of mrtg, you can more or less copy an existing template.
The template complexity comes in when you want to do something *more* complex
than what mrtg does.
> Instead of mrtg we use Cacti. It's easier to manage
> and most device templates already exist for importing.
Which devices do you need templates for? Have you tried creating templates for
them in devmon?
Regards,
Buchan