[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring

To: xymon (at) xymon.com
Subject: Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
From: "Epp, Matthew Mr CTR USA USA" <matthew.epp (at) us.army.mil>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:18:03 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=us.army.mil; i=matthew.epp (at) us.army.mil; q=dns/txt; s=akodkim; t=1287422293; x=1318958293; h=message-id:date:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:from; z=Message-ID:=20<4CBC814B.9050800 (at) us.army.mil>|Date:=20Mon ,=2018=20Oct=202010=2013:18:03=20-0400|MIME-Version:=201. 0|To:=20xymon (at) xymon.com|Subject:=20Re:=20[xymon]=20devmon =20or=20mrtg=20which=20is=20good=20for=20network=20device s=20monitoring|References:=20<AANLkTim8ScYyOPJu3u2d=3DYy2 Vd05rCMEh1=3DccvJUhemT (at) mail.gmail.com>=20<1287418781.1159 6.11.camel (at) mcdonalddj-dc.austin-energy.net>|In-Reply-To: =20<1287418781.11596.11.camel (at) mcdonalddj-dc.austin-energy .net>|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|From:=20"Epp,=20M atthew=20Mr=20CTR=20USA=20USA"=20<matthew.epp (at) us.army.mil >; bh=MrgVjsJsBxE4CYCbGTBB6yUW+S5GFD8jxvIzB4aSGXQ=; b=kDQ1a9q6IjDlJD2Iei95rrxoTKA8FfkOYP7U1Qm+X50gHZ8l/9/HPSUB Gh7NPh4pshcHiX8jCeW9BsNCTP9QyHlPWUJAz5aa4hrCWirQ07dSjOjZB gTYKz2Jw86OXL48hsV71G3Ni2+mkXIq9j0ba8Wz63Xhx4rMMeP7MIMnQq 0=;
Domainkey-signature: s=ako; d=us.army.mil; c=nofws; q=dns; h=From:X-AKO:X-AKO-AuthID:X-IronPort-AV:Received: Message-ID:Date:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=XwrqWgYXvKim/0qV5BtbnkDaVyoD85sYm3xb/FzA9RDvPfAd/TornqF0 y7Oddts7cxzwYfao4hycPgnr6B9IUQ==;
References: <AANLkTim8ScYyOPJu3u2d=Yy2Vd05rCMEh1=ccvJUhemT (at) mail.gmail.com> <1287418781.11596.11.camel (at) mcdonalddj-dc.austin-energy.net>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228)

Daniel J McDonald wrote:

On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 20:56 +0530, rigved sharma wrote:

Hi,
sorry for the earlier mail..i want to know which one is good for xymon
for network devices monitoring..devmon/mrtg.
Please help.


It's a religious question.  I use mrtg because it supports snmp-v3, I
already have my templates built, and I can live with the hack that is
bb-mrtg.pl.  Other people like devmon, but I haven't been able to test
it because of the snmp-v3 issue.

I use devmon for some device polling, although it takes some time writing templates for devices.Instead of mrtg we use Cacti. It's easier to manage and most device templates already exist forimporting.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
  - From: Buchan Milne
- RE: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
  - From: SebA
- Partition Monitoring
  - From: isolderj

References:
- devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
  - From: rigved sharma
- Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
  - From: Daniel J McDonald

Prev by Date: Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
Next by Date: Partition Monitoring
Previous by thread: Re: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
Next by thread: Partition Monitoring
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread