[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
- To: <xymon (at) xymon.com>
- Subject: RE: [xymon] devmon or mrtg which is good for network devices monitoring
- From: "SebA" <spa (at) syntec.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:47:42 +0100
- References: <AANLkTim8ScYyOPJu3u2d=Yy2Vd05rCMEh1=ccvJUhemT (at) mail.gmail.com> <1287418781.11596.11.camel (at) mcdonalddj-dc.austin-energy.net> <4CBC814B.9050800 (at) us.army.mil>
- Thread-index: Actu6MQA3KUIYT3OTUu0MALDA2STyQAC7Erg
Epp, Matthew Mr CTR USA USA <mailto:matthew.epp (at) us.army.mil> wrote:
> Daniel J McDonald wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 20:56 +0530, rigved sharma wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> sorry for the earlier mail..i want to know which one is good for
>>> xymon for network devices monitoring..devmon/mrtg.
>>> Please help.
>>
>> It's a religious question. I use mrtg because it supports snmp-v3, I
>> already have my templates built, and I can live with the hack that is
>> bb-mrtg.pl. Other people like devmon, but I haven't been able to
>> test it because of the snmp-v3 issue.
>>
>
> I use devmon for some device polling, although it takes some
> time writing templates for devices.
> Instead of mrtg we use Cacti. It's easier to manage and most
> device templates already exist for
> importing.
Can Cacti integrate with Xymon? I found this:
http://www.deadcat.net/viewfile.php?fileid=921
But the description doesn't look confidence-inspiring.
SebA
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.448 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3203 - Release Date: 10/17/10
18:33:00