[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiple graphs on one page
- To: xymon (at) xymon.com
- Subject: Re: multiple graphs on one page
- From: Joe Acquisto <joe.acquisto (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 11:20:42 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Mp1REkaoX8CtIGSfPEBKCGTXNf+VBpFHHZ8xnOmpx+A=; b=k+JJvOlWr653HSO3sH2E+PKgq/Hk6Tw5FXEUK6020t68rKLYopNH7OI2KDNZgQi83N VdGNLP0kM80P026+qmqZ/7qmjL7yVkCvJfYJUVOM58wHbH02ptrfO8AVR2sf7Qea12vc tvaZk5g43hnrSSFEoDWaRR3J8QBmyu8t5SVBc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=dWXoqTqSJkoYxS45E0BsitEuJrN+6a13/NLsaBE4UYt12a0jOxFj8ouMWZCID9p89O YSKVoLnXefFsPs5mqJnNdqj0qxP6S5UB4bphTtAOiSeNEorUhNM49PG3dUyZiU402Ksa ly2Ptv/QLPdjxmLjVkljJCcrmxpbERSHT7W6Y=
- References: <AANLkTi=ehyjH74oo+3ip6qESKurRYtOPJ-Zvjgg-txpt (at) mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiktqLFCgAKHdsb-6CWA7vUee0dOEG6_sdx-+JvR (at) mail.gmail.com>
Are there no suggestions? Or, is this considered to simple and clearly
documented for any response at all?
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Joe Acquisto <joe.acquisto (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> I find that --mulitgraph does not do what I thought, but does place
> mulitple graphs on the page I specify. However, the 5 additional graphs are
> void of data. Not too astonishing.
>
> I cannot find anything that defines how to structure the graphing
> definition (stanza ?) to specify what goes where.
>
> joe a.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Joe Acquisto <joe.acquisto (at) gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I've been digging for a while and cannot find how I can put two graphs on
>> one page. Kind of like the trends page.
>>
>> While I see the --multigraph option, I am not certain this is what I
>> want. Nor can I see how I could associate multiple graphs with a single
>> page.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
>