[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] BBWin Virtual Memory
- To: "hobbit (at) hswn.dk" <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] BBWin Virtual Memory
- From: Johan Sjöberg <johan.sjoberg (at) deltamanagement.se>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 16:06:52 +0100
- Accept-language: sv-SE
- Acceptlanguage: sv-SE
- References: <B08F3F3D67451844A7A8A029FCC71E4C11092D1E1F (at) WIN01.ad.deltamanagement.se> <da23ff6b1003050629ve5b0f7bt6bc32077bda4067e (at) mail.gmail.com>
- Thread-index: Acq8ctgr+NDwvZO3Rs2wuJXII9LxwQAAgjDw
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] BBWin Virtual Memory
Hi.
I have tried with both static and dynamic virtual memory size. The virtual memory size always shows up as 2047 MB regardless. Physical and Page size and usage seem to be correct though.
Here is an example of how physical and virtual does not add up to the Page value, as it should. This machine has 12 GB of physical memory, and a dynamically sized virtual memory which is currently around 12 GB as well.
Memory Used Total Pctg
Physical: 6652M 12277M 54%
Virtual: 59M 2047M 2%
Page: 6945M 24553M 28%
/Johan
-----Original Message-----
From: ben.jessie (at) gmail.com [mailto:ben.jessie (at) gmail.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: den 5 mars 2010 15:30
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] BBWin Virtual Memory
Physical and Virtual memory reports fine for me, I have 0.12 installed
on a number of 2003 and 2008 servers. Do you have static pagefile
sizes set? I'm not sure how BBWin looks for virtual memory usage, but
if it's just doing a filesize check on your page file that might
explain it.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Johan Sjöberg
<johan.sjoberg (at) deltamanagement.se> wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
>
> I am posting this here, since the BBWin project seems (even more) dead.
>
>
>
> I have been trying to figure out what the different values in BBWin's memory
> test are. During this, I noticed that the "Virtual" size is shown as 2047MB
> for all our Windows clients, regardless of the real size of the virtual
> memory. Has anyone else noticied this?
>
>
>
> Also, it seems like the "Real" memory indicator mentioned in the help file
> does not work at all.
>
>
>
> What alarm levels do you people use for Memory in BBWin? We have previously
> only been using "Virtual" for alarms, but with the recent discovery that
> seems like a very bad idea.
>
>
>
> /Johan
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk