[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] BBWin Virtual Memory
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] BBWin Virtual Memory
- From: John <xymon.user.ml (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 08:29:47 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xbVZrg3PJ4TDxNcf5TKgUHIDn60KtOWPNvrUlCEJ8Es=; b=gByyx7d0SR5GqdjQ4uxzNzbyjN6JSJpfCrqtY0tRKmkF2+adcHPKYgooOQXf5ospLb NJpIwI1BnkXWPKTqHvns2sj69x/3cYY6FBP35sUETb/poN70C4TGgfet7IPZdZ6gWgbS /3uglqPL4wWyakQBzfoVm+CYU4Zcdu6Tl//lg=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=iEh0NqF2y6pmnRegLDXNvOEgju1+gVX76pN8x1sbFgSTP3n+ujUi+4+/PLXLuSw6yf MHZeSJazKzErlasNMCcTGZBcw3WJIVQXr2Xg4dF6ZBFF3nItLOu/qrdHdqUV891DVRab 513IVuGIOKN4jNh9wKGzj3wUDAbROmEHvBYYg=
- References: <B08F3F3D67451844A7A8A029FCC71E4C11092D1E1F (at) WIN01.ad.deltamanagement.se>
Physical and Virtual memory reports fine for me, I have 0.12 installed
on a number of 2003 and 2008 servers. Do you have static pagefile
sizes set? I'm not sure how BBWin looks for virtual memory usage, but
if it's just doing a filesize check on your page file that might
explain it.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Johan Sjöberg
<johan.sjoberg (at) deltamanagement.se> wrote:
> Hi.
>
>
>
> I am posting this here, since the BBWin project seems (even more) dead.
>
>
>
> I have been trying to figure out what the different values in BBWin’s memory
> test are. During this, I noticed that the “Virtual” size is shown as 2047MB
> for all our Windows clients, regardless of the real size of the virtual
> memory. Has anyone else noticied this?
>
>
>
> Also, it seems like the “Real” memory indicator mentioned in the help file
> does not work at all.
>
>
>
> What alarm levels do you people use for Memory in BBWin? We have previously
> only been using “Virtual” for alarms, but with the recent discovery that
> seems like a very bad idea.
>
>
>
> /Johan