[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] DISK & MEMORY checks go red
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] DISK & MEMORY checks go red
- From: Steinar M. Skúlason <steinarms (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 22:54:39 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=nBnpRZwo3AmM0WgyTw6GKQYW2TSJgw2YOSMOTZj+3QA=; b=WOigNDDaN17QDoCRQnq3OUA66C49umpv+dwi7b8vR51O5cokR6nZRpo7JSu+954gEZ wj+7Lms7wFyqWpLe/IKfuSo+aSSAi7NtnWJYNn5kpv9uTFZI+xpEIXs8T9SYLRVQD7jk XmsPi4Yy3qNDyKkbaD8jDAY/K4s4Cp6wY8Rg0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=eX0MLYtJiSiBj3ZOnaAMs0f7oRR9fDNQ0BT4aPyjhpzXeSBj2l+XzYEJGI5zt2GX2k qvBXpGS/n8E6LypQKo1qjgIkfy9ey6/OUbRKT2A6JEQYe+PQvQ2ggyZ/gHnIxKh5SJI+ ePs4oFaur+yRajv1nVkjbiRMYcz7xwQWOb/Oc=
- References: <17bd4d511002240720k7e6810c3u629f99093e25d56a (at) mail.gmail.com> <426A0EF5343CDE4CAA8565BBEDB9526F0140DF7F (at) USMSG111.leinternal.com>
Thank you Johan and Stewart.
For google's sake I put the variables here, I'm trying these over sized
values and see how that will turn out.
If I run into problems then I will try something more realistic.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Stewart, Tom L.
<Tom.Stewart (at) landsend.com>wrote:
> I got rid of this by increasing the MAXMSG_* within the hobbitserver.cfg
> file. Although it looks like when you get rid of the alert issues, you start
> getting holes (previously noted by many) in a few of the rrd files.
> *From:* Steinar M. Skúlason [mailto:steinarms (at) gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 24, 2010 9:20 AM
> *To:* hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> *Subject:* [hobbit] DISK & MEMORY checks go red
> I am running xymon 4-3-0-beta2 ( revision 6223 ).
> I am having problems with clients ( all running in dmz mode using msgcache
> ) where they sometimes show alert for disk and memory, and usually check
> shows usage as several hundred % which is obviously due to some error in the
> check. I have not found out why this happens.
> Anyone else with similar problems ? and maybe found a solution or a
> workaround ?
> Best Regards,
> Steinar M.