[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] snapshot 2008-11-14 zlib version is too old
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] snapshot 2008-11-14 zlib version is too old
- From: Martin Flemming <martin.flemming (at) desy.de>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:54:17 +0100 (CET)
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811141609310.23310 (at) pal31.desy.de> <gfufud$raq$2 (at) voodoo.hswn.dk> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811181444430.25989 (at) pal32.desy.de>
... it seems,
that i'm the only one, who wants to build/install
the newest snaphost on RHEL4 .... ain't i ?
... and if so, does anybody knows which latest snapshot
will build on RHEL4 with zlib-version 1.2.1.2
.. by the way, i see in this moment .. :-)
the latest rpm for rhel4 from Buchan is from the second of april ...
http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel4/hobbit/i386/
where can i get this snapshot ?
thanks & cheers
martin
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Martin Flemming wrote:
Hi, Henrik !
Well - a "1.2.1.2" version really *is* older than 1.2.3.
... indeed, that is clear :-)
But unfortunatley on Scientific Linux 4, RHEL4 ..
there is no zlib-version 1.2.3 available ...
only 1.2.2
Obviously , it has to be written "1.2.1.2" !
.. typing error ...
and this version should be secure
http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-584.html
2005-07-21
http://www.zlib.net/
zlib 1.2.3
July 18, 2005
Hmm, have i to patch test-zlib.c to compile hobbit-snapshots
on Scientific Linux 4/ RHEL4 System for myself, or is there any other chance
?
Thanks & Cheers,
Martin
On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Henrik Størner wrote:
In <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811141609310.23310 (at) pal31.desy.de> Martin Flemming
<martin.flemming (at) desy.de> writes:
> checking for zlib ...
> Found ZLIB include files in /usr/include
> Found ZLIB libraries in /usr/lib
> zlib version 1.2.1.2
> Your zlib version is too old, requires version 1.2.3 or later
> ZLIB version too old, must be at least version 1.2.x
Well - a "1.2.1.2" version really *is* older than 1.2.3.
According to www.zlib.net "Version 1.2.3 eliminates potential
security vulnerabilities in zlib 1.2.1 and 1.2.2, so all users
of those versions should upgrade immediately."
The reason you didn't see the problem with the April snapshots
was that zlib wasn't used back then.
> ... i remember a problem from September
Different problem, the zlib test in Hobbit back then used
some non-standard ZLIB macros.
Regards,
Henrik
To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk