[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] strange graph behavior - random machines & graphs
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] strange graph behavior - random machines & graphs
- From: "Gary Baluha" <gumby3203 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2008 14:14:44 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=wv+MStXV/W8DcGFvHkl4z7obaTcP41WGRTRUIsqF9ng=; b=AgUt3L2LYpLiheUqJnzDHUwcBxLJ6IaQP7qKNF3jyBbD79K+T5fCtmmP4VgPmY/DcQdtJBGM5pe4vTOEOGXaCNfrdlCFFZmeQKVyp3j+wWurdylEZXzbbnKj5k/UhU6xp9N2pAwHpIJLp2eAWm3uXYP3ZwSDsEzdVlYmz9fVAGc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JKhZZF5c9vZG+eo7XiRuTlgZwS2N7dFaKg6PslX1NNMNnDRMuamlsZXPUWCImE544LJawmBhcVW7zs3ezGJitFM5PmthgQwEm9YMNA2KTIlVJGTa/FT1MxodkxWPOYWkLq3oP+iqrSGLaDK1nuLrHxGH7TkuZssz1w8MCpywS1Y=
- References: <29f517690712050853u4d47ef3cr25fc15f538cdf85c (at) mail.gmail.com> <29f517690712071213k1c0214a2of2eb6ff400815004 (at) mail.gmail.com> <58EF0861D3A1A04182720B3A5231C7C201EA5138 (at) usplm205.amer.corp.eds.com> <29f517690712110642r7aa2c073wb23409bc1bb71bad (at) mail.gmail.com> <29f517690712120714y2a40280cib186239487583d32 (at) mail.gmail.com> <6C2B32F89382AF42875672B6F5BEB68204F54885 (at) MERCMBX07.na.sas.com> <961092e10712120728o906c216hec40c55ae9f0ece4 (at) mail.gmail.com> <6C2B32F89382AF42875672B6F5BEB68204F548B6 (at) MERCMBX07.na.sas.com> <29f517690712121045l3da75cc3ib5daf8ef86a7ab6c (at) mail.gmail.com> <29f517690712190659g5674db41xc1dc6d135080b74b (at) mail.gmail.com>
I thought I'd revisit this issue again. A new thought has occurred to
me... Where does Hobbit generate the RRD files? I wonder what parameters
Hobbit is using to pass to rrdtool, and if something there might be acting
funny with some of the data I'm providing to that Hobbit module.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 10:59 AM, Gary Baluha <gumby3203 (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> It's interesting that it seems the CPU Load and Users and Processes graphs
> are the graphs that are most likely to have this strange corruption. I have
> also seen it on a few Disk graphs, but not nearly as many as the other two
> graphs. Interestingly, the CPU Utilization, Network I/O, and TCP Connection
> Times graphs have _never_ had this corruption. I'd also like to say the
> Memory Utilization graph hasn't had this issue either, though I can't recall
> with complete certainty that that is the case.
>
> I wonder what the main difference between the 3 graphs that do have the
> issue is, and the 3 (possibly 4) graphs that have never exhibited this
> issue. There must be some physical difference, as I can't imagine it is all
> due purely to luck...
>