[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Fail over?
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Fail over?
- From: "Ralph Mitchell" <ralphmitchell (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 13:02:30 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=lxbRfZMEZS7M9mGKibCB1AON8W4OsMmo/QCgUXfbDN4=; b=YfB/610MBp0uks6eIm+6a+jcwoIj4B5FxUpNfLJgxTQYPsbxHRaYAmTNWqoH61d8JbKHOaU1PtQu7JqBIB35dTsVTpCKWWzePb/W+bGUIEoBtdQB9vmJiVbOitmRV2O0Un3sElGL4e78Epdmx9r3VGVV8U/AVO4lN3QL/3xfEro=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WVVua18TRtSTTC4TZNiLNqSeekBOXranCKqmE8vClcqvQkZzZB56u2eheTuBS1xSOF/ZCNdmqywJtSlTiNcWQjl3fTV7by0mzICRUCMDSes9mAWlm5Gi347qqVctuLRMSCAhgyvsp2o7966et4Zii8zZWL/Rgp+JwCEZExXgtak=
- References: <1d23acab0710231118u74cf98eer1df154dd303ff690 (at) mail.gmail.com> <20071023200234.GD16672 (at) hswn.dk> <BAY138-W11B4D91D708229B6FDDFF59F940 (at) phx.gbl> <961092e10710240715n33d04591geeb37fa388645090 (at) mail.gmail.com> <5e59d8180710240923ofd9c98dh58091c1e21594914 (at) mail.gmail.com> <BAY138-W1427DF397E186AEA0E545D9F940 (at) phx.gbl>
On 10/24/07, T.J. Yang <tj_yang (at) hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Isn't a proxy is another SPF (Single point of failure) ?
>
Yes, but a proxy doesn't have to be as complicated as a whole Hobbit
server. It wouldn't even necessarily have to have disks drives - in a
crunch you could probably run a Linux distro off a LiveCD or USB
stick, with Squid or Tinyproxy builtin.
Ralph Mitchell