[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Fail over?
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Fail over?
- From: "Paul Ehrenreich" <paulehr (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:23:20 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=8cPplBhfcEF5skp4DCKuFoDjMCM8PQSd+dV9Mj3+tKE=; b=pi7+LBEbqK4/CipGSgmKXvsHwkVSApFC8ZjntwEUX00OhOOWctFDWsPyjZjYGmE/5GM3GdNkSrtwPQnebRWqPVmhrXzbLuaR3JDDImzSaOu/7RqpfXOf5zA+6O6T3yqzwyrtSqqIJmPxfcdOHoDnrqI882GA2leOUIqjW7wTlHs=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=p3pDzNflEioMI8IRXEq1oPP9XwP/vsx6X6bMFHGWAX9gRc0Z0yTG3e3Aj9iBFW8EWrweOVzEnXk7WAAbPGe8L4/hPcJaXROFt3B28U6K7buAbsDdV50/PO4AA0D1GniX/Bio//u+s5LBqY/9gwAKporegNCEgTDVl6Ka8ETPGqI=
- References: <1d23acab0710231118u74cf98eer1df154dd303ff690 (at) mail.gmail.com> <20071023200234.GD16672 (at) hswn.dk> <BAY138-W11B4D91D708229B6FDDFF59F940 (at) phx.gbl> <961092e10710240715n33d04591geeb37fa388645090 (at) mail.gmail.com>
That sounds like an interesting idea to use squid to load balance between
the two servers. I need to do something similar in our lab and been trying
to figure out the best way to do it.
On 10/24/07, Josh Luthman <josh (at) imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>
> I believe you could use something like a proxy (Squid maybe?) for clients
> to connect to and then use one or the other. I'm not familiar at all with
> squid itself so I may be completely off, but a load balancer does sound like
> an option.
>
> On 10/24/07, T.J. Yang <tj_yang (at) hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:02:34 +0200
> > > From: henrik (at) hswn.dk
> > > To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> > > Subject: Re: [hobbit] Fail over?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 02:18:16PM -0400, Stewart L wrote:
> > > > So, how are others doing this? I have a server set up here in my
> > > > primary data center. We're monitoring a few thousand hosts right now
> > > > with a large number of custom externals.
> > > >
> > > > I've been tasked with setting up a fail-over or disaster response
> > > > server in case our primary data center has issues. All of our
> > clients
> > > > are currently configured to send their messages to the IP address of
> > > > our primary server.
> > > >
> > > > Now, I could just copy the bb-hosts file to the DR site, but then I
> > > > would only get the network tests since the clients all report to the
> > > > primary.
> > >
> > > I run two completely separate systems in parallel, and have the
> > clients
> > > report to both of them. The system at our disaster center has the
> > paging
> > > module disabled (just disable the [bbpage] section in hobbitlaunch.cfg
> > ),
> > > to avoid double alerts - it is simple to activate it, if necessary.
> >
> >
> > I was thinking of using Sun Cluster(hb on Solaris) or HeartBeat(hb on
> > Linux) but
> > then how can I configure the Cluster solution to failover from one
> > site(Florida) to another(NewYork) ?
> >
> >
> > I believe this setup is the most simple failover solution at the only
> > expense of extra
> > network bandwidth usgage to the secondary hb server.
> >
> > tj
> >
> > > Config files are rsync'ed from the primary site to the disaster site
> > > regularly.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Henrik
> > >
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> > > hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live
> > OneCare! Try now!<http://onecare.live.com/standard/en-us/purchase/trial.aspx?s_cid=wl_hotmailnews>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
> --- Henry Spencer