[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [hobbit] Anyone working on an NT client?



Yeah, I just did some looking around -- and I can't find 'UEST' as a
time zone. We've got 'EST' (Eastern Standard Time, North America, UTC -
5) and 'EST' (Eastern Summer Time, Australia at UTC + 11, Eastern
Standard Time, Australia, UTC + 10) and 'U' (Uniform time zone, military
(US?) UTC - 8).

I'm going from this site:
http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/

But the field IS the time-zone field on the headers from the *nix
systems. I wonder if we'll see 'UEDT' next year, since Indiana has
decided to get back into the "change the clock" game.

I'd still like to see the source . . .

Tom

-----Original Message-----
From: PAUL WILLIAMSON [mailto:pwilliamson (at) mandtbank.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 1:12 PM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: RE: [hobbit] Anyone working on an NT client?

>>> dan.mcdonald (at) austinenergy.com 12/28/05 12:01 PM >>>
On Wed, 2005-12-28 at 11:54 -0500, Kauffman, Tom wrote:
> > Well, among other things, I'd be a bit happier about the client
myself
> > if the company name weren't so prominently mis-spelled in the past
two
> > releases. I'm assuming that 'UEST' in this header is really
supposed to
> > be 'QUEST': Wed Dec 28 12:01:19 UEST 2005.
> 
> Isn't that a timezone?

Assumptions are a funny thing...

LOL, that is some funny ish...I seriously doubt they'd stick the 
name of their company in the middle of the date.  It's probably  
referencing they are using Universal EST or something like that.
I've never heard of that, but I'm guessing that the UEST is not 
because they misspelled Quest.

Paul


To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk