[xymon] alternative to bb command
Jason Kincl
jkincl1 at lsu.edu
Tue Sep 7 16:57:31 CEST 2010
On Sep 6, 2010, at 5:59 AM, Kolbjørn Barmen wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Buchan Milne wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 3 September 2010 00:49:30 Jason Kincl wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I am wondering if using netcat instead of bb to send status updates to a
>>> xymon server is a bad idea?
>>
>> What prevents you from using bb?
>>
>> In the cases where I can't install bb, I can't have netcat either, so I use
>> perl.
>
> Sometimes, all you have is busybox and then nc is alot more likely to be
> around than perl :)
This is basically what we have going on here, a box that we do not want to add extra software to if possible. Netcat is working nicely so far, thanks!
> Also, perl is a hige memory hog and slow (due to disk access) compared to
> doing everything inside busybox sh - to I avoid perl on embedded systems
> or other systems with limited memory resources.
>
> --
> Kolbjørn Barmen
> UNINETT Driftsenter
--------------------
Jason Kincl
More information about the Xymon
mailing list