[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] Highlights of the 4.3.0 version
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] Highlights of the 4.3.0 version
- From: "Hubbard, Greg L" <greg.hubbard (at) eds.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:38:58 -0500
- References: <200708030831.29685.bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net> <483387BD5310504F95897573FF3E350D04C23A4A (at) dpex.dpcorp.internal> <6C2B32F89382AF42875672B6F5BEB682038E8FD8 (at) MERCMBX07.na.sas.com>
- Thread-index: AcfVmExhwts47R8IQ8KHawajThfqHwAQ5N/wAAFS7nAAAKCLsA==
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] Highlights of the 4.3.0 version
Well, I use Netcool which has the opposite philosophy -- there is a
"process automation" system that watches processes and restarts them if
they fail, while also logging restarts. You can configure a "restart"
parameter to be anything from 0 (forever) to any number of times. I
like to set a reasonable number so persistent errors eventually kill the
process, but occasional errors do not. Log files are not overwritten,
but are appended and rotated.
But whatever. My view seems to be in the minority -- guess the rest of
you don't mind 24x7x365 babysitting.
GLH
-----Original Message-----
From: Galen Johnson [mailto:Galen.Johnson (at) sas.com]
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 10:18 AM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: RE: [hobbit] Highlights of the 4.3.0 version
DOn't forget...this is the model that Tivoli and HP Openview, and many
other commercial monitoring solutions provide and sell as a feature.