[Xymon] vmware or similar virtual image
Poppy, Ben
poppy.ben at marshfieldclinic.org
Tue May 15 20:50:17 CEST 2012
I agree, in fact, going to a virtual solution increases robustness of the monitoring server itself. You are no longer relying on a single piece of hardware as a single point of failure. Well-built vmware clusters have the ability to fail over to other servers and automatically bring the virtual servers back online, thus eliminating single points of failures. This is especially true when teamed with multiple path disk systems and networks..
-----Original Message-----
From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Schwartz
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:18 AM
To: xymon at xymon.com
Subject: Re: [Xymon] vmware or similar virtual image
> I would, however, take exception to virtualizing your monitoring server...
> call me crazy or old-school, but it always seemed wrong to me.
IMHO this is depends on the robustness of your virtualization solution.
We're moving onto a large scale VMWare cluster with EMC and HP/3Par storage backends. I'm not at all worried about the xymon server (currently running on a G4 which is one of the smallest and oldest boxes in the shop) _______________________________________________
Xymon mailing list
Xymon at xymon.com
http://lists.xymon.com/mailman/listinfo/xymon
______________________________________________________________________
The contents of this message may contain private, protected and/or privileged information. If you received this message in error, you should destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies, and you are prohibited from retaining, distributing, disclosing or using any information contained within. Please contact the sender and advise of the erroneous delivery by return e-mail or telephone. Thank you for your cooperation.
More information about the Xymon
mailing list