[hobbit] Different Tests for different clients: but same localclient.cfg

[Hubbard, Greg L]

the menu on the main monitoring page (or any page)  pick Reports ->
Ghost clients.
 
GLH


________________________________

	From: William Ottley [mailto:wottley at cmicanada.com] 
	Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:22 PM
	To: hobbit at hswn.dk
	Subject: Re: [hobbit] Different Tests for different clients: but
same localclient.cfg
	
	
	Ahhh ok, I can look into that. But ummm :$ "ghosts report"?
Sorry not to sure where that is...
	
	
	
	On 3/19/09 4:18 PM, "Hubbard, Greg L" <greg.hubbard at eds.com>
wrote:
	
	

		Your Mac client is probably not communicating correctly
with the Hobbit server on your Solaris 10 machine.  Check your ghosts
report to see if you have a naming mismatch between your bb-hosts file
and what the Darwin client is sending.  If there is a mismatch, you
either fix it at the client (with a startup parameter for the bbclient
process) or at the server end with a CLIENT tag in the bb-hosts file.
(Or something like that, I am working from memory).
		
		GLH
		
		

			
			 
			
________________________________

			From: William Ottley
[mailto:wottley at cmicanada.com] 
			Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:09  PM
			To: hobbit at hswn.dk
			Subject: [hobbit] Different Tests  for different
clients: but same localclient.cfg
			
			 
			Hi all,
			
			I compiled the client for solaris 10  and for
the mac OSX.
			They have been added to the bbhosts file on the
hobbit  server.
			They both have the same localclient.cfg,
pointing to the hobbit  server.
			
			I'm trying to get all the tests to show up. 
			But only some  of them do so. What needs to be
changed to do so?
			
			Solaris10:  Bbd,  conn, cpu,  disk, files, http,
info,  memory,  msgs,   ports,   procs,  trends
			OSX:    conn,  info, trends
			
			The mac has almost no tests on it: is this
because the  server isn't talking to the client?
			
			Any help would be  appreciated.
			
			Thanks
			
			Will
			
			
			On 19/03/09 2:38 PM, "Taylor  Lewick"
<tlewick at tradebotsystems.com>  wrote:
			
			
			

				Is anyone doing anything to be alerted
on a per Core  basis instead of overall CPU.  This would apply to both
Linux and  Windows, under windows using the bbwin  client...
				

	
	
	-- 
	This message has been scanned for dangerous content by
MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be
clean. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xymon.com/pipermail/xymon/attachments/20090319/9320d43e/attachment.html>