[hobbit] No alarm on route:

[Tod Hansmann]

As an FYI for the archives, I think this might be doable via a NOPROPYELLOW:+conn but I can't experiment with it at the moment, so it will be left in theory for the moment =c)

Tod Hansmann
Network Engineer

 
________________________________________
From: Tod Hansmann [mailto:thansmann at directpointe.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 9:30 AM
To: hobbit at hswn.dk
Subject: [hobbit] No alarm on route:

This may actually be a silly question, but I didn't find anything in the docs that sounded like it fit the bill.  Anyway, we monitor a lot of remote sites where we monitor one device with another device behind it, with another device behind it, with more devices behind that, etc.

We're using route:nexthostout in bb-hosts to keep all of them from going red when the devices further down the line aren't the issue, but they still turn up yellow on the bb2 page.  Is there a way to only see the device that actually went red, and not the others that require it as their route?

If not, it's no deal-breaker, but it would be helpful if our alarms page wasn't covered in hosts just because a remote site's internet router went down.

Tod Hansmann
Network Engineer
333 South 520 West, #200
Lindon, Utah  84042
Office:  801.805.9700



CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION: E-mails from DirectPointe may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient.  If you received this e-mail in error, please delete the e-mail and all attachments.  Thank you.