[Xymon] rrd logs and graphs

Vernon Everett everett.vernon at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 09:35:25 CET 2015


Hi all

I was only back at the client today, and unfortunately have not managed to
get that patch in yet.
(As I mentioned before, it's a production system)

However, I did notice something really odd.
I have focused my attention on the trends graphs, where I get all the extra
values, but it's not happening in the test itself, despite the existence of
the additional rrd files.

Example.
I have something that plots the power usage of the PSUs on a NetApp
e-series.
There are 4 PSUs, output looks like this.

Total power drawn- 487 Watts
Number of trays- 2
Tray power input details-

   TRAY ID  POWER SUPPLY SERIAL NUMBER   INPUT POWER
   99       0                            145 Watts
   99       1                            151 Watts
   0        0                            99 Watts
   0        1                            92 Watts

All good. And I have a graph with 4 lines. Min, Max, Curr and Avg values
are all there. It looks beautiful.
But go look at the power graph in trends, and it's ugly.
Heaps of additional data lines with no entries. All values are NaN
And mixed in amongst the additional empty graphs, are the 4 valid lines.

I look at the rrd files, and they are all there, even the bad ones.
Here's a few of them.
power,tcpListenDrop.rrd
power,tcpOutAck.rrd
power,tcpOutDataSegs.rrd
power,tcpOutRsts.rrd
power,tcpOutUrg.rrd
power,tcpOutWinProbe.rrd
power,tcpRetransSegs.rrd
power,tcpRtoMax.rrd
power,tcpRttUpdate.rrd
power,tcpTimKeepaliveProbe.rrd
power,tcpTimRetransDrop.rrd
power,Tray0_PSU0.rrd                  <--- Valid
power,Tray0_PSU1.rrd                  <--- Valid
power,Tray99_PSU0.rrd                 <--- Valid
power,Tray99_PSU1.rrd                 <--- Valid
power,trlogpool.rrd
power,UDP_udpInDatagrams.rrd
power,udpInCksumErrs.rrd
power,udpOutDatagrams.rrd
power,vnet.rrd

So I thought I would check my configs.
In xymonserver
>From TEST2RRD= ,power=ncv,
>From GRAPHS=  ,power::9,
And further down
SPLITNCV_power="*:GAUGE"

And in graphs.cfg
[power]
    FNPATTERN power,(.*).rrd
    TITLE Database Power Consumption Per Tray PSU
    YAXIS Watts
    -l 0
    DEF:p at RRDIDX@=@RRDFN@:lambda:AVERAGE
    LINE2:p at RRDIDX@#@COLOR@:@RRDPARAM@
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:LAST: \: %5.1lf (cur)
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:MAX: \: %5.1lf (max)
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:MIN: \: %5.1lf (min)
    GPRINT:p at RRDIDX@:AVERAGE: \: %5.1lf (avg)\n

With luck I will get approval to recompile with the debugging bug-fix, and
we can get more info, but I thought the extra entries in trends, but not in
the test was interesting.

Regards
Vernon








On 13 March 2015 at 15:24, J.C. Cleaver <cleaver at terabithia.org> wrote:

> On Wed, March 11, 2015 5:51 pm, Jeremy Laidman wrote:
> > On 11 March 2015 at 14:18, Vernon Everett <everett.vernon at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> About now, I am getting a little nervous adding send and expect, because
> >> unlike telnet and telnets, we are doing ldap and ldaps testing.
> >>
> >
> > That's understandable.  A read through the code suggests that at least in
> > some places, an empty string is equivalent to an undefined string, as the
> > string length (shown in Sendlen in the debug output) is zero in both
> > cases.  So until a patch is in place, a work-around might be to define
> > empty "send" and "expect" strings for those that have none.
> >
> > Any suggestions?
> >> I think we have some debug code update recommendations for JC though.
> >> :-)
> >>
> >
> >  Here's my patch.  I'll push this into the dev list for proposed
> inclusion
> > in a future release.
> >
> > --- lib/netservices.c.orig      2012-07-25 01:48:41.000000000 +1000
> > +++ lib/netservices.c   2015-03-12 11:18:18.000000000 +1100
> > @@ -328,9 +328,9 @@
> >         dbgprintf("Service list dump\n");
> >         for (i=0; (svcinfo[i].svcname); i++) {
> >                 dbgprintf(" Name      : %s\n", svcinfo[i].svcname);
> > -               dbgprintf("   Sendtext: %s\n",
> binview(svcinfo[i].sendtxt,
> > svcinfo[i].sendlen));
> > +               dbgprintf("   Sendtext: %s\n",
> > svcinfo[i].sendtxt!=NULL?binview(svcinfo[i].sendtxt,
> > svcinfo[i].sendlen):"[null]");
> >                 dbgprintf("   Sendlen : %d\n", svcinfo[i].sendlen);
> > -               dbgprintf("   Exp.text: %s\n",
> binview(svcinfo[i].exptext,
> > svcinfo[i].explen));
> > +               dbgprintf("   Exp.text: %s\n",
> > svcinfo[i].exptext!=NULL?binview(svcinfo[i].exptext,
> > svcinfo[i].explen):"[null]");
> >                 dbgprintf("   Exp.len : %d\n", svcinfo[i].explen);
> >                 dbgprintf("   Exp.ofs : %d\n", svcinfo[i].expofs);
> >                 dbgprintf("   Flags   : %d\n", svcinfo[i].flags);
> >
> > This produces "[null]" where we would have seen "(null)" on a GNU-based
> > OS,
> > to differentiate between the two situations.
> >
> > In the mean time, you could compile a special version of xymond_rrd, and
> > run it manually on the same data channel as the real one, but have it
> make
> > RRD files and log file to a different location.  This shouldn't interfere
> > with your production Xymon.  Here's one I prepared earlier that works for
> > me:
> >
> > sudo -u xymon mkdir /tmp/my-rrd-data/
> > sudo -u xymon xymoncmd /bin/sh -c 'XYMONTMP=/tmp;
> > /usr/lib/xymon/server/bin/xymond_channel --channel=data
> > --log=/tmp/my-rrd-data.log /path/to/xymond_rrd_debug_patch
> > --rrddir=/tmp/my-rrd-data/ --debug'
> >
> > This seems to show some really useful stuff that's relevant to solving
> > your
> > problem.  Some sample debug lines:
> >
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 xymond_rrd_debug_patch: Got message 165619
> >
> @@data#165619/servername|1426120588.401891|172.16.0.1||servername|vmstat|sunos|ABC
> > ...
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 Creating rrd
> > /tmp/my-rrd-data//servername/vmstat.rrd
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 00: 'rrdcreate'
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 01:
> > '/tmp/my-rrd-data//servername/vmstat.rrd'
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 02: '-s'
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 03: '300'
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 04: 'DS:cpu_r:GAUGE:600:0:U'
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 05: 'DS:cpu_b:GAUGE:600:0:U'
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:36:28 RRD create param 06: 'DS:cpu_w:GAUGE:600:0:U'
> > ...
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 Got 265 bytes
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 xymond_rrd_debug_patch: Got message 165737
> >
> @@data#165737/servername|1426120782.080244|172.16.0.2||servername|trends||DEF
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 startpos 216644, fillpos 216644, endpos -1
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 Flushing
> > '/servername/tcp.xopiy90404.parameter.rrd' with 1 updates pending,
> > template
> > 'sec'
> > 15306 2015-03-12 11:39:42 Want msg 165738, startpos 216644, fillpos
> > 216644,
> > endpos -1, usedbytes=0, bufleft=1884603
> >
> > J
> >
>
>
> This is some excellent sleuthing! :)
>
> As I was pouring through the thread (sorry, I've been out the last few
> days), I failed to take note of the SPARC-Enterprise-T2000 in the output.
>
>
> The patch below should fix the immediate issue triggered by debug mode...
> letting us move on to the larger oddness. Unfortunately, I have a feeling
> there are other occasions where we're relying on GNU's printf(NULL)
> printing that out and thus might be caught by this. As I find them, I go
> ahead and work to put fixes in.
>
> In the meantime, this will be in 4.3.19 and can be patched directly from
> below.
>
>
> HTH,
>
> -jc
>
>
> --- lib/netservices.c   (revision 7598)
> +++ lib/netservices.c   (working copy)
> @@ -81,9 +81,9 @@
>         unsigned char *inp, *outp;
>         int i;
>
> -       if (!buf) return NULL;
> +       if (result) xfree(result);
> +       if (!buf) { result = strdup("[null]"); return result; }
>
> -       if (result) xfree(result);
>         if (buf && (buflen == 0)) buflen = strlen(buf);
>         result = (char *)malloc(4*buflen + 1);  /* Worst case: All binary
> */
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xymon mailing list
> Xymon at xymon.com
> http://lists.xymon.com/mailman/listinfo/xymon
>



-- 
"Accept the challenges so that you can feel the exhilaration of victory"
- General George Patton
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xymon.com/pipermail/xymon/attachments/20150320/1993958d/attachment.html>


More information about the Xymon mailing list