[Xymon] Xymon Network Tests - Behaviour?

Dugan, Darin D [EIT] dddugan at iastate.edu
Wed Aug 24 16:01:43 CEST 2011


Sounds like you're suggesting "disable until OK" should continue to test, but "disable for XX minutes/hours/days/weeks" should not test until the disable expires.

I can see the argument for that, but I also see the argument that it's nice to drill into disabled tests and see what their current status would be if not disabled (current behavior). Personally I prefer the latter--continued testing while disabled.

Does testing a disabled host cause a problem for you in some way? Do you have a lot of disabled hosts?

Cheers.

-----Original Message-----
From: xymon-bounces at xymon.com [mailto:xymon-bounces at xymon.com] On Behalf Of Xymon User in Richmond
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 8:11 AM
To: xymon at xymon.com
Subject: Re: [Xymon] Xymon Network Tests - Behaviour?

On Wed, August 24, 2011 08:42, henrik at hswn.dk wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:52:55 +0200, Mario Valetti 
> <mariov652 at gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Is it possible to disable a host in a way that avoids Xymon checking
for the host at all?
>
> No. How would Xymon detect that the host becomes OK without trying to
ping it ?
>

Why would Xymon care about whether a host disabled for a specific period of time becomes OK during that time?



_______________________________________________
Xymon mailing list
Xymon at xymon.com
http://lists.xymon.com/mailman/listinfo/xymon



More information about the Xymon mailing list