[hobbit] Migration to SourceForge tracker?

Buchan Milne bgmilne at staff.telkomsa.net
Mon Aug 25 09:27:43 CEST 2008

On Friday 22 August 2008 20:36:14 Jon Dustin wrote:
> >>> On 8/22/2008 at 10:01 AM, "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang at hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If given voting right, I would vote for using trac to coordinate the
> > hobbit community.  sourcefoge looks like has a bigger supersets of
> > features than trac. I like the Statistics (R1) especially. Too bad we
> > (hobbit community) is not totally embraceing sourceforge.


I don't see any point of doing any development without a development mailing 
list so that there can be common direction in development.

However, if there isn't going to be a development mailing list, you could add 
buchanmilne as a developer on the project ...

> > Ex, we still
> > have our own mailling list while sourceforge provide this feature.
> >
> > I can work with either sourceforge or trac solutions, but please lets
> > utilize a solution's features as much as possible.

Until we are using all the features on sourceforge, there's pretty much no 
reason to discuss features in other tools we wouldn't use.

> Henrik has already spoken about Sourceforge mailing list, and has expressed
> they are quite unreliable.

s/are/have been in the past/g

We haven't seen any problems on the devmon lists (but, granted, they don't 
have as much traffic).

> The existing mailing list works quite well for
> us now, why not keep it as is?

I don't think there's any point in migrating the "users" mailing list, but 
there are some advantages to having a devel list on sourceforge.


More information about the Xymon mailing list