[hobbit] "sublevel alerts" feature request

T.J. Yang tj_yang at hotmail.com
Sat Sep 24 18:11:02 CEST 2005


Execuse me for  missing a few words in my previous email.
I am sure you can put in the right words when you read through
the sentences.

tj

>From: "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang at hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: hobbit at hswn.dk
>To: hobbit at hswn.dk
>Subject: RE: [hobbit] "sublevel alerts" feature request
>Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2005 07:20:42 -0500
>
>"fine grain alert" is a better term than "sublevel alert".
>I only see one followup.  I am interested to see this feature
>to be done.  I am not  much a developer.so I can't help much coding wise.
>
>Can anyone comment  how diffcult is it to get this feature ?
>
>Can this be done by external moudle approach ?
>
>Right now, I don't have whole BB/Hobbit server architecture flowchart
>in my head so I am looking for comments that knows.
>
>Thanks for your to comment
>
>tj
>
>
>
>>From: "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang at hotmail.com>
>>Reply-To: hobbit at hswn.dk
>>To: hobbit at hswn.dk
>>Subject: [hobbit] "sublevel  alerts" feature request
>>Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 04:58:52 -0500
>>
>>sorry to make up this name "sublevel alerts", correct me if there is a 
>>better term you think.
>>
>>
>>What:
>>
>>sublevel alerts:  to be able to send out alerts to differrent owners of 
>>different monitored disk partitions or processes.
>>
>>Why:
>>We found it is needed  to enable  the owner of a process or disk partition 
>>as the main recepient of the alerts. This way we can hold owner 
>>responsible on using the disk partition wisely. currently BB can only send 
>>out alerts to both unixteam and oracleteam when disk or process threshold 
>>reached.
>>(see example below).
>>
>>
>>Example:
>>
>>[bbs ] tail  bb-dftab.DIST
>># ANY PARTITIONS NOT EXPLICITLY LISTED HERE WILL
>># USE THE VALUES SET BY DFWARN & DFPANIC SET IN
>># bbdef.sh. DEFAULTS IN bbdef.sh ARE
>># WARNING AT 90% AND PANIC AT 95%
>>#
>># You can also use values > 100 to make it always green
>>#
>>/usr:92:98 : unixteam at test.com
>>/home:88:93: engineergrp at test.com
>>/db:100:101: oracleteam at test.com
>>[ilad4001|bbs ] tail  bb-proctab.DIST
>>#
>>#    If you put a process with no directives then it is
>>#       test condition is that at least 1 process must be running
>>#       It keeps backward compatibility
>>
>>: sshd :
>>localhost: sendmail;<=2 bbrun !xntpdd : httpd;>=16: unixteam at test.com
>>localhost : :snmpd "sleep 30;<6": unixteam at test.com
>>www.bobo.com : inetd : bbd: unixteam at test.com
>>www: inetdd : bbdd: unixteam at test.com
>>llocalhsot: lsntr:: oracleteam at test.com
>>[|bbs ]
>>
>>
>>Question:
>>Can hobbit consider to support this feature ?
>>Is there work around you know for existing BB users ?
>>
>>Thanks for your time
>>
>>T.J. Yang
>>
>>
>>
>>To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
>>hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
>>
>>
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
>hobbit-unsubscribe at hswn.dk
>
>





More information about the Xymon mailing list