[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [xymon] badtest option for ldap
- To: xymon (at) xymon.com
- Subject: Re: [xymon] badtest option for ldap
- From: Larry Barber <lebarber (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:41:14 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=V1d5oThtOhiae1JK+2QBzHgiAwZcfbLst9PEkFeCBSU=; b=g6drVNPs/EMrlHhbDV8NDNOq4LJblwowT3H1bNmjEUrB2hZWKiI/mxhLcytNSEitXh SOjUpQAHOt8khq+tr38/3424F4CxeiDRrqOwTLMK3c8+X/LUGqrGtoaAb5O/dIiq5QGk TCH1W1Q4p8JwX1vErD3k9DtCUYasAsTCXwjJk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Frp5LzQHkb7eKuLd9HfTClPJqdWW2OMkt6LF0OhddqHMtcg7OuXTXYTWmjHhv4Elu6 aJ1dZm6rMCxOquZBsTw2MUNgRKY/S5Jgju3WSVUpdg8Rgu24keOpyRDqan1Z+GtqJUq+ GRxP9UHKKQZezqaMt5d0xxP6fHf4SklRtVpMU=
- References: <BLU162-w590D6939774DFD9065DF61ABF60 (at) phx.gbl> <FEB12387-778B-47E0-81F4-B69080DD2A94 (at) skurfer.com> <BLU162-w8844DF7E4C6423E132F11ABF90 (at) phx.gbl>
You should be using colons instead of commas: badldap:1:2:5 .
Thanks,
Larry Barber
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:51 AM, simo hmami <simobimou (at) hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your answer
>
> you are right
> 0.0.0.0 hostname # ldap badldap:1,2,5
> works fine
>
> but
> 0.0.0.0 hostname # ldap://somehost:someprot/dn ldaplogin=login:pwd
> badldap:1,2,5
> doesn't work, it goes red immediately when there is an error.
>
> Do you have any idea about this !?
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> From: mailinglist0 (at) skurfer.com
> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:10:18 -0500
> To: xymon (at) xymon.com
> Subject: Re: [xymon] badtest option for ldap
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 5:53 AM, simo hmami wrote:
>
> It seems that the "badtest" option is not working for all the network
> tests, it works fine for the http but not for ldap.
> I'm using xymon 4.2.3
> Did any one manage to get it work for ldap ?
>
>
> I've had it enabled for a while. I'm using “badldaps:1:2:5” and I'm pretty
> sure it's working. I see some alerts on the “ol” test (which monitors
> regular LDAP on 389) and then some alerts on “ldaps” that come a few minutes
> later. However, I mainly just didn't want to be alerted during daily log
> rotation, which is predictable, so I've been using DOWNTIME to silence the
> alerts. I'm not really depending on badldaps at this point.
>
> By the way, I highly recommend Buchan Milne's script for monitoring LDAP…
>
> http://staff.telkomsa.net/~bgmilne/xymon/ol/<http://staff.telkomsa.net/%7Ebgmilne/xymon/ol/>
>
> --
> Rob McBroom
> <http://www.skurfer.com/>
>
>