[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?
- To: "'xymon (at) xymon.com'" <xymon (at) xymon.com>
- Subject: SV: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?
- From: Carl Melgaard <Carl.Melgaard (at) STAB.RM.DK>
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 15:27:57 +0100
- Accept-language: da-DK
- Acceptlanguage: da-DK
- References: <3BD667CCFBD0D04CA2BC3D57D01B642630C79A290D (at) HORMXB103VM1.onerm.dk>
- Thread-index: AcuSDdj8JOvxq1irSQiB6xmZn+rnLgEDNH1w
- Thread-topic: How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?
Hi,
Noone has a suggestion to, how I can suppress and hide tests only used in my combotest below? I need to make the red-tests disappear, so they wont create noise in the alerting or the acknowledge-page. How can I hide red-alerts and suppress alerting on them?
/melgaard
________________________________
Fra: Carl Melgaard [mailto:Carl.Melgaard (at) STAB.RM.DK]
Sendt: 2. december 2010 11:44
Til: 'xymon (at) xymon.com'
Emne: [xymon] How to suppress alerts when combo-testing?
Hi,
Im monitoring a cluster-setup, a/b-nodes + cluster ressource:
10.83.13.12 bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk # COMMENT:"SLES11cluster-res" prefer
10.83.13.10 bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk # COMMENT:"SLES11a" ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps
10.83.13.11 bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk # COMMENT:"SLES11b" ldap ldaps ntp ntpd badntp:1:3:3 prefer NOCOLUMNS:ldap,ldaps
ldap + ldaps will always be red on one of the nodes, so I've made a combotest to insert on the cluster-ressource:
bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldap = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldap + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldap ) == 1
bskidmsrv001.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps = ( bskidmsrv001a.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps + bskidmsrv001b.bsk.rm.dk.ldaps ) == 1
This works on - the green status shows up on the cluster-resseource host - BUT I still get alerting on all the hidden red-tests, and I can still acknowledge all of the tests, I thought I hid away with NOCOLUMNS.
How do I achieve this - ie. suppressing the red alerts on the nodes where ldap/ldaps is not running?
Regards,
Carl Melgaard