[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Monitoring Exchange 2010 - imaps/pop3s alarms
- To: xymon (at) xymon.com
- Subject: Monitoring Exchange 2010 - imaps/pop3s alarms
- From: Shawn Heisey <hobbit (at) elyograg.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 14:02:04 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elyograg.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:subject :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:date:date:message-id :received:received; s=mail; t=1290114126; bh=oc+kDO/xTTzwUyg/MJA Za1w76DGK/blv15SMXS3GwjM=; b=YaOtXpJ6yQ9RzZG3X/AJT5O8zgzuTxrshmO UeLHnbiinhWBjGWvlLiHwi0ZJg1JOQYq1AD3kVe9qmugWFgA2+EFfs5M3oiGmXBa rsNUe8R4Bh0C0Wvpfzht3Wg6PBz0UVC7C0VIaZP+a85GmVGum1AV6RDj1nLz4p2r u7vfPSmg=
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
I have recently migrated from Exchange 2003 to Exchange 2010. Several
times a day, I get alarms for imaps and pop3s, which are resolved less
than a minute later.
The graph (http://www.elyograg.org/pop3s.png) shows hourly spikes in
reponse time. The alarms are not every hour, but when they do happen,
they correspond to the spikes. The email from xymon looks like this.
Note the "seconds" value, which is extremely low. Anytime there's an
alarm, the value is low like this.
----
Service pop3s on server.example.com is not OK : Service unavailable
(connect timeout)
Seconds: 0.003435
----
There have been no complaints from people who use the service, and
believe me, I'd hear about it if there was a problem.
The non-SSL versions are not alarming. I just noticed that the graph
for pop3 has two entries - pop3 and pop3s. From what I can tell, it
checks TLS on the standard test. The pop3s graph on the pop3 entry
looks identical to the pop3s graph I've included here, except it's red
instead of blue.
I suspect that it's related to the throttling policies in Exchange 2010,
but I don't know what to change. I don't want to open the default
throttling policy way up, but I did change the anonymous connection
limit from 1 to 5. Has anyone else had this problem and found a way to
solve it?
Thanks,
Shawn