[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SV: [xymon] bbtest yellow-mystery
- To: xymon (at) xymon.com
- Subject: Re: SV: [xymon] bbtest yellow-mystery
- From: Henrik "Størner" <henrik (at) hswn.dk>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:50:24 +0000 (UTC)
- Newsgroups: lists.hobbit
- Organization: Linux Users Inc.
- References: <3BD667CCFBD0D04CA2BC3D57D01B642630AC9B3D44 (at) HORMXB103VM1.onerm.dk>,<201007121329.36843.bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net> <201007121329.36843.bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net> <3BD667CCFBD0D04CA2BC3D57D01B642630ABC81727 (at) HORMXB103VM1.onerm.dk>
- User-agent: nn/6.7.3
In <3BD667CCFBD0D04CA2BC3D57D01B642630ABC81727 (at) HORMXB103VM1.onerm.dk> Carl Melgaard <Carl.Melgaard (at) STAB.RM.DK> writes:
>But why is the check still running against the AD-host I've disabled?
"Disable" is kind of a misnomer, because as You found out it doesn't
stop Xymon from running the test - it only means that it won't bother
with sending out the alerts.
The main reason for this is that without running the test, Xymon couldn't
implement the "Disable until OK" feature (which I find is really handy).
A second reason is that programming-wise it is actually a lot easier
to just run all the tests.
Regards,
Henrik