[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Depends Question
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Depends Question
- From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:23:22 +0100
- Cc: wiskbroom (at) hotmail.com
- References: <AANLkTin8J8_32y0wKkSdOmTWFNgK8IelBRAzN8RamiO7 (at) mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTil4V4E4-dYee34nX9FPobDGoKg1bDucDkhICOzr (at) mail.gmail.com> <BAY147-w41DBF6A5538AD97975469CB4B30 (at) phx.gbl>
- User-agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.13-desktop-1mnb; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
On Wednesday, 7 July 2010 14:46:52 wiskbroom (at) hotmail.com wrote:
> Thanks all;
>
> In my situation, we have a pair of servers where one of the two must be
> running a process, that is what we monitor; the existence of the process
> running, not the availability of the host.
>
> Any suggestions anyone?
Running under clustering software, or not?
(using depends on combotest or similar for this is not elegant, as there could
be other process checks which you want to alarm on on both servers).
Regards,
Buchan