[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Problems running on a Solaris Zone
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Problems running on a Solaris Zone
- From: Vernon Everett <everett.vernon (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:34:05 +0800
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ETs3V0+MAGP+z1trc0QJeLO5eN341pz4CptMjWgw7wE=; b=HTcUuAP+EMqFhC3+lQyTAkvNFBXjDNH2EcEGpuaUQYpDZtG7agma3jIIH3JqhYP/sx 735m2fHo0mNVxAHy3qqgIuCkUdnVuUA7TkL31QDJlfG7euwq/KYcmXkUo7zGiSAuG+t6 kPtd5ilzUFKb2OH1LJUO+/HLflPnIAXtfIf+8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=jCW+4dFdMiPeAkYX8U0wXQD/xucjqA56aGb+NYDQZSrnXTN/PrA2J4mhPAsKXDFVIE h/lQvTb/+J3K4U8ANNwXKU0VyBHSOjQ5o5cpNq10PP9fKvQqANxyY2cdHF2f4CtyU3EM 5DnVnBOUP8lGG99+DxPzb6GCpXLIo3kD9WVlU=
- References: <E6EE65A78A1A4642BB12B4A693A3C589 (at) hhsea.txnet.state.tx.us>
I put a lot of effort into this recently, and there does not appear to be
any real practical solution to the problem.
The problem is caused by how zones use memory and kernel space.
In sparse zones, all kernels are the same kernel. There is only one instance
of the kernel running, and as a result, only one chunk of memory visible to
When you set a memory cap in your zone definition, and do a prtconf in the
zone, it reports the value of the memory cap as the available memory.
So far, so good.
However, to determine free memory, we have to interrogate the kernel. This
can be done a number of different ways. Xymon, by default uses vmstat.
You can also use kstat -p unix:0:system_pages:freemem and I am sure there
However, the kernel in question, is the kernel running in the global zone!
It's all one kernel.
So the reported memory free is the free memory available to the kernel. It
should be the same value in all the zones too.
The error you are seeing occurs when free memory available to the global
kernel is more than the memory cap you have placed on the zone.
In C (and many other programming languages), if you subtract big numbers
from smaller numbers, you sometimes get strange results depending on how
your variables are defined. I think that's where your multi-Petabyte memory
is coming from. Any programmers out there that can confirm this?
The other problem this creates, is that any sane-looking zone memory
percentages are meaningless. They do not represent the true memory
utilisation within the zone. Your zone memory utilisation could be 100%, and
you would not realise it, because your kernel is still seeing heaps of free
memory, and reporting lots free.
Imagine a 2gb cap, and the apps in the zone are using all 2gb.
However, the kernel can see 1.8gb free.
Do the maths. Xymon tells us your zone is only using 10% of memory, which is
far from the truth.
The only real way round it might not fit with your policies and methods.
You need to remove all memory caps.
This floats all memory, meaning that the memory "seen" in the zone, is the
same as the kernel, and Solaris does the management of memory, ensuring all
zones get enough.
It also means that all of the zones will show identical memory graphs.
The other way, which I haven't had time to do yet, is to use prstat -Z in
the global zone.
This gives a summary of what the zones are using, which might be worth
As a short-term workaround, because we need memory caps for certain apps, we
have skipped memory monitoring on the zones. (It's pretty meaningless anyway
- see above)
We have the global zone, and below it, all the zones, with the
NOCOLUMNS:memory bb-hosts tag.
It's not really ideal, but I hope to find time to revisit this in the near
It would be nice to be able to disable just the memory test on these, and
only keep an eye on swap. Swap is local to the zone, and if you start using
heaps of it in the zone, or are doing lots of paging, chances are you are
maxing out your memory allocation.
So swap is probably a good indicator.
Sorry I could not be of any more help.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:35 AM, James Wade <jkwade (at) futurefrontiers.com>wrote:
> *Has anyone see this problem. I’ve just compiled 188.8.131.52.beta2 on a
> Solaris 10 system. I’m running on a Sun T5120 series in a Solaris
> sparse zone. * *When I run the server, I get the following on the memory
> Fyi.. I don’t have 4.2 peta bytes of memory *J *Has anyone seen similar
> problems. Running the client in the global zone works fine.* *Tue Feb 23
> 10:52:43 CST 2010 - Memory CRITICAL*
> Memory Used Total Percentage
> [image: red] Physical 4294966186M 26624M 4294967292%
> [image: green] Swap 148M 26623M 0%