[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PORT check based on running PROC
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: PORT check based on running PROC
- From: Asif Iqbal <vadud3 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:49:59 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=VT1YP9SGQaY8GGkRzKLeyjcPlBn/+0TFFocotfUdc4s=; b=ve+hjkbUTQeR/DAsznlOn59CKh9Dl7FI1xDs5Xw4Xm1ZifaE22Pu5fKHFDWmcJEhIV 0N1a/1wiog4EuMMGR9yc8mZ3/fUZY6Is4bUQfJuhrcsGfYyLNgh5V0xYxK/v5bYo2H7W nvWWkgKTCcysCOII1svY37eNR6ZGrzjCcAdT0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=t+ZZ3YiNLKFXeU0T0KNIQzVxJqRcqEY3HRLHLXpkO9G3caKSQGZPlETqzWUuCFo5Y7 Kf8EPrNDQM2IF/7kFKzTCBkwBhDR9NESdEzRhzq1xjubyh6eJDgP7j6m+Zxf+g2IjMAx r5IgUCV8ypRPXkRbBJ6Tlji49Fp7eigM6HH10=
- References: <a60f25fc1001251436o41081c9cxe58287165a7d0aed (at) mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Asif Iqbal <vadud3 (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> How do I do PORT tests as a condition to running PROC ?
>
> In other words do the PORT test and alert me only if PROC A is running.
> Otherwise ignore.
>
>
Let me make the scenario little bit more interesting.
I have HOST A and HOST B. hobbit client is running on both of them.
If process P should be run only on one of them at a time and that will make
that
HOST, the primary HOST.
So if process P runs on HOST A then I want to be alerted based on PORT tests
on HOST A
if process P runs on HOST B then I want to be alerted based on PORT tests on
HOST B
If process P runs on both HOSTs then I want to be alerted about POST tests
on both HOSTs.
However this third scenario should not happen
I was thinking of creating an entry in bb-hosts with a dynamic HOST name
which will be something like
HOST=%IamPrimary.*
PROC ..
PORT ..
That probably makes it a lot more complicated than it may already is.
Please advise.
Thanks
> --
> Asif Iqbal
> PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
>
>
>
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?