[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] AntiSpam & RBL Hits - Does it Make Sense to Monitor?
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] AntiSpam & RBL Hits - Does it Make Sense to Monitor?
- From: K K <kkadow (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:29:14 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=723Vlc2FoZm1SHU5RkeCp+ETJIg+htVcbAHDtsj//84=; b=vNycXQrqysGeuDNGBtuWoti4c2GcL3ID1yhiniFFei7VjsrMjcHDADee1fVD8MLy0T 220zCkrKqAqiJ6dG8UXGawNSynJrcAuJd8zqeIk8mCGmSWN11FG1Ia/3MUdaKnQ5KL0X p8IYLnKh8epzcaRE0A+8KFQmJEtrrbHvgDLuw=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=mGQ9bSYwCxGWxOdgiGZAuQLSbaemzy8Pr7pwSDiQSZnLWRTV6y5vMNBKXnYqmNfibM 4GWxVstC0hjDHGT3xSstdqPhk8S+CVw6OHgpkX33lBrj0s/tFRiGohrjiJ6jgrWkn1SD PulTXnPdBAOiyuoLjTNTXBy010mKycogY0vNA=
- References: <BAY133-W7947D59E4D13F8F4827EBB4A10 (at) phx.gbl> <4B0C1442.5060600 (at) makelofine.org>
In the past I have graphed inbound email volume via RRD,
including a 'stacked' filled-area graph of rejects showing which
DNSBL(s) triggered the reject.
Since I use 'rblsmtpd' to query 4 RBLs in series, it is useful to know
which one is performing the best, so I can move it earlier in the
sequence, or if one seldom gets a hit (or starts blocking everything)
I can remove it.
As mentioned earlier, attractive graphs are eye-pleasing to management folk.
Kevin