[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Xymon FILE check (hobbit-clients.cfg)
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Xymon FILE check (hobbit-clients.cfg)
- From: <j.sansford (at) ntlworld.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:54:32 +0100
- Cc: Greg Hubbard <glh.forums (at) gmail.com>
- Sensitivity: Normal
Sorry for taking so long to get back to the list.
I managed to find an inconsistent configuration on one of our servers. Looks like the "client-local.cfg" file wasn't populated correctly. Putting in the name of the file here solved the problem.
Many thanks all,
James.
---- Greg Hubbard <glh.forums (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> Hard to debug this one -- especially since the Xymon "style" is to silently
> ignore errors in configuration files. You say it is "random" but have you
> tried to correlate server operating system, etc. with success/failure? Are
> you mixing BBWIN and UNIX agents?
>
> You might pick one "failing" server and check the client log files for clues
> (not sure what to tell you to look for). You might do the "is it plugged
> in?" things -- does the log file that you want to check exist, is it
> readable by the agent, did the agent recognize the file, was the file
> defined properly in the client-local.cfg file on the server, etc.
>
> GLH
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 8:34 AM, <j.sansford (at) ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys - I'm having a bit of trouble getting this check to work. It seems
> > random whether it will work for servers or not.
> >
> > Some have the check working (and show a green status) however other hosts
> > have the check as clear, so Xymon thinks it isn't defined for those hosts.
> > Thing is, I have other checks defined in hobbit-clients.cfg for those hosts
> > which *are* working, which rules out the "HOST=" part not being read
> > properly.
> >
> > Any ideas..is this a known issue? Thanks!
> >
> > To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> > hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Disclaimer: 1) all opinions are my own, 2) I may be completely wrong, 3) my
> advice is worth at least as much as what you are paying for it, or your
> money cheerfully refunded.