[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] FILES directory test not graphing
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] FILES directory test not graphing
- From: Patrick Nixon <pnixon (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:15:37 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F2qPLbiIzV3Q08T2tcbzY2SITcNxGqJBFS3BrFTWN4w=; b=XHhcgoFQyZYD53NaQOjtXN0m/cfI9kOr8Mq3G0zjxQqu9M7aHc9TTF5WHPZK+eYLln Hb7XO2U/Qp4DgX3IXGIBP14JVh48aHAxOSqPIOvBeD+lf381zFT+fnWT4mwkPHVWK3Gj WKZNyN5F8Rhoc5T10eLqLdPUn/8Zd0QgFBpj0=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZCfYNeQlQawe5cPlS1xxYXir5QqYtkDfYxv/mNDjV64mwoeIV9F0H13MZLJqUkTNUR 0XA2lwT/U6HErXiAZ0Al8Ty82PObLmlD7ri09K0lHGnpo8ENNibShmbN9aEHVaEdM99U 1EE91XybTcGJ5huLF6h5mFVr7hdeqnDtxXVd0=
- References: <c6fda93d0910190840j45105a02p7ee9d2d139862ed6 (at) mail.gmail.com> <9f45dd4e0910190843g79738142qb2ff1c9a4f3ed946 (at) mail.gmail.com> <c6fda93d0910190903h5b37fd57sc85f86c87bd10c66 (at) mail.gmail.com> <9f45dd4e0910190910n1e1d59f3hb71b19de37b4cdfe (at) mail.gmail.com>
Thanks for the follow up Greg.
There were two issues I found.
1.) The du command was reporting in 512k blocks, not bytes as I was
expecting it to. I fixed it by adding DU="/usr/bin/du -b" into the
hobbitclient.cfg file
2.) because of the above, you were right, the data was being graphed
next to a file, that was already being reported in bytes, so it was
disappearing.
--Patrick
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Greg Hubbard <glh.forums (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm. A directory looks like a file, too, and it has a size. Are you
> interested in the size of the directory itself (as a file) or are you
> interested in the total size of all files contained within the directory?
>
> What are the units in the graph that you are looking at, and is the
> directory by itself or is it combined with other items? One problem with
> RRD graphs is that everything in a graph gets the same scale factor, so if
> you combine something small with something large the small item can appear
> to be near zero because other items are much larger.
>
> GLH
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Patrick Nixon <pnixon (at) gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The Files test provides a mechanism to graph the size of the object
>> being monitored through the TRACK option.
>>
>> For the file, it graphs the size of the file.
>>
>> I'm assuming that it's supposed to do that for the directory as well,
>> but it's showing a flatline at 0 instead of the value show in the
>> footer of the graph, which at the time of this email is 121161.9.
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Greg Hubbard <glh.forums (at) gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > What do you want to graph, and what is wrong with the current graphs?
>> > It
>> > helps if you provide more detail.
>> >
>> > GLH
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Patrick Nixon <pnixon (at) gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hey all,
>> >> I did a search, but these are rather generic terms, so I'm hoping
>> >> someone has seen this.
>> >>
>> >> When a directory is added to the FILES test, it doesn't graph
>> >> properly, even though the data is appearing at the bottom of the graph
>> >> image.
>> >>
>> >> Any suggestions on what to tweak, how to troubleshoot this?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> --Patrick
>> >>
>> >> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
>> >> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Disclaimer: 1) all opinions are my own, 2) I may be completely wrong,
>> > 3) my
>> > advice is worth at least as much as what you are paying for it, or your
>> > money cheerfully refunded.
>> >
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
>> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Disclaimer: 1) all opinions are my own, 2) I may be completely wrong, 3) my
> advice is worth at least as much as what you are paying for it, or your
> money cheerfully refunded.
>