[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Checking if both links for Cisco CEF are down?
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: Checking if both links for Cisco CEF are down?
- From: d.tom.schmitt (at) L-3com.com
- Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:28:41 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=l-3com.com; i=d.tom.schmitt (at) l-3com.com; q=dns/txt; s=mail; t=1254778123; x=1286314123; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20d.tom.schmitt (at) L-3com.com|Subject:=20Checking=20i f=20both=20links=20for=20Cisco=20CEF=20are=20down?|Date: =20Mon,=205=20Oct=202009=2015:28:41=20-0600|Message-ID: =20<2B2CEF0E4EE10B449E5D9BB95E6DA0E8FD11A1 (at) MAIL2.csw.l-3c om.com>|To:=20<hobbit (at) hswn.dk>|MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=zz73xV+9TyUAptHu6G1s/vmaQg/cnewqhGk7iMa0fWM=; b=gnpKRN2U06obGlVHZhxS141a8G5GgeIrgTwoXpQs5ccdoZlqghF+mr1Q Dc6CapqS+J3q/IhbIN94oEMiKWpFiQ==;
- Thread-index: AcpGAs8yvyfwlo8LQWKthy/Wzd2pzA==
- Thread-topic: Checking if both links for Cisco CEF are down?
Using the 'route:' keyword, is there a way to create dependencies when
you are using a Cisco router with 2 T-1s using Cisco Express Forwarding
(CEF)?
I have a remote router that has 2 T-1s balancing using CEF. Behind this
router are multiple devices that need to not alert if both T-1s are
down.
This would be very similar to have a single T-1 line to the remote site
except I have to be able to group both T-1s together.
Can you do something like:
Near end router: Ethernet port Local-Eth
Near end router: Serial 0 and Serial 1 Local-S0 and
Local-S1
To
Far end router: Serial 0 and Serial 1 respectively
Remote-Eth
Far end router: Ethernet port
Remote-S0 and Remote-S1
To
Rest of the network at the remote site e.g.
Remote-Switch
Can you group devices together using ()'s?
Something like:
I want Remote-Switch to depend upon both T-1s being
down:
10.10.10.10 Local-Eth
10.10.20.20 Local-S0
10.10.20.21 Local-S1
10.10.20.22 Remote-S0
10.10.20.23 Remote-S1
10.10.30.30 Remote-Eth
10.10.30.31 Remote-Switch #
route:Remote-Eth,(Remote-S0,Remote-S1),Local-Eth
Would this work?
This says that the Remote-Switch needs to have the
Remote-Eth (Ethernet) connection as a dependency.
It also needs both T-1s up and the Local-Eth (Ethernet)
connection up.
CEF is a Cisco balancing protocol for multiple same
connections to a remote location.
If one T-1 is down, the other T-1 will be tasked with
handling all the traffic.
When the down T-1 returns, it again participates in the
traffic load.
Thanks,
Tom Schmitt