[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] memory graph
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] memory graph
- From: Greg Hubbard <glh.forums (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 13:32:40 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=exyEcTz7hzw5SNBNua+EF+lemujJ8A7+AU+TTcBBqvE=; b=L8lDIU4Q2G6UV6H1zrBezFSS76xoXyV5gax5pk9ORcrb1ZJ6tqQSsVTknwM0ZD5WdN ZhkH3vadzEBVjDtGKGXLUIkLW11mRphQ98Ekv7gN/8PqAq536Jt56qkF0gBVM37ltdYa 8BVBu6QL7rfVH+icCi5Gb+KTVFPkeBGq98DDA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HAhBtikEUYgYgj5ht9fkRZMYGjyqSMFLfkqscFOagXbByGZAJaMe60W8xGmZ+SINEN iMo9yc9/xSgERwJ+LAz8bDJoh0zRdDIAIt+PH0cI+Glt6a60ik+6Pk0+0ph5E/lMcba/ djKQ9tc8OVLpLnR3fbXRfk90LYEyVSDVWOKws=
- References: <578430320908261058g68941734w6070fad6eea60189 (at) mail.gmail.com>
Is there some reason why you think it is not the amount of physical memory
in the system as reported by the operating system? As opposed to "virtual"
memory?
GLH
On 8/26/09, Shailesh Paudyal <shailesh.paudyal (at) gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wanted to know what the "real" stands for in the hobbit memory
> utilization graph. If anyone can explain this to me, I would appreciate it.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Shailesh K. Paudyal
> shailesh.paudyal (at) gmail.com
>
--
Disclaimer: 1) all opinions are my own, 2) I may be completely wrong, 3) my
advice is worth at least as much as what you are paying for it, or your
money cheerfully refunded.