Re: [hobbit] [Hobbit] URLPlus interest - looking for feedback

[Ralph Mitchell <ralphmitchell (at) gmail.com>]

I could really have used something like your feature request about 6 years
ago.  Instead I spent a lot of time handcrafting bash scripts to login to
web pages.

Don't get me started on the sites that hit you with 5 different types of
redirects before reaching the front page, or the sites where each input
field is held in it's own personal form. and the submit button executes
javascript to copy the values into form full of hidden fields for the actual
submittal.

Gary, I'll help out where I can, but I'm not very good with perl...

I'm pretty sure you're going to need to break out the url stuff into some
kind of config file and just leave an "urlplus" flag in bb-hosts.

Ralph Mitchell


On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Morsiani, Massimo <
massimo.morsiani (at) gilbarco.com> wrote:

>  Hi Gary,
>
> nice to hear that you're in the loop again.
>
>  I'm currently using v1.21 ($Id: url-plus.pl,v 1.21 2008/04/30 13:56:07) and
> I'm happy with it.
>
> My main reason to use it is:
> - per host customizable response time
>
> My feature request is the capability to do something like the following:
> 1. go to a web page
> 2. insert username/password to login
> 3. surf the web site following specific links
> 4. grab some data from a specific web page
> 5. check the grabbed data (ie if GRABBED_DATA < MY_THRESHOLD then alert)
>
>
> Regards.
>
> Massimo Morsiani
> Information Technology Dept.
> ------
> Gilbarco S.r.l.
> via de' Cattani, 220/G
> 50145 Firenze, Italy
> tel:    +39-055-30941
> fax:    +39-055-318603
> email:  massimo.morsiani (at) gilbarco.com
> web:    http://www.gilbarco.it
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Gary Baluha [mailto:gumby3203 (at) gmail.com]
> *Sent:* mercoledì 29 luglio 2009 18.35
> *To:* hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> *Subject:* [hobbit] [Hobbit] URLPlus interest - looking for feedback
>
> For those of you who have been around here for a while, you will have
> noticed that I've been somewhat absent of late.  The short story is, I have
> changed jobs and just don't get as many opportunities to check in as I used
> to.  This also means I have left my reasons for working on URLPlus behind,
> which is why development of it has stopped.
>
> The purpose of this post is because I have gotten a few requests from time
> to time about URLPlus, and I'm curious what the interest in me getting back
> to developing it would be.  I've been out of the loop as far as new features
> in the latest version of Hobbit being worked on, but from what I understand,
> while there are more web page monitoring features built-in, there are still
> some things where URLPlus could be useful.
>
> So, I would be interested in the following feedback:
> 1) Is there still demand for more robust website content checking features
> than what Hobbit supports out of the box?
> 2) If so, what are the features missing in Hobbit that people are looking
> for?
> 3) For those who have chosen to use URLPlus, what are the reasons for that,
> versus using some other Hobbit plugin (or for that matter, some other
> monitoring tool)?
> 4) Finally, for those that are using URLPlus, what additional features
> would you like to see it be capable of doing?
>
>
> -Gary
>
> Please be advised that this email may contain confidential information.
> If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy or
> re-transmit this email. If you have received this email in error,
> please notify us by email by replying to the sender and by telephone
> (call us collect at +1 202-828-0850) and delete this message and any
> attachments. Thank you in advance for your cooperation and assistance.
>
> In addition, Danaher and its subsidiaries disclaim that the content of
> this email constitutes an offer to enter into, or the acceptance of,
> any
> contract or agreement or any amendment thereto; provided that the
> foregoing disclaimer does not invalidate the binding effect of any
> digital or other electronic reproduction of a manual signature that is
> included in any attachment to this email.
>