[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Intelligent alerting across multiple servers?
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Intelligent alerting across multiple servers?
- From: Patrick Nixon <pnixon (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 09:02:45 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BG3q/dWgRjcG59yZ53y3AqYZgSboRBhUaadb+z6SMo4=; b=jbsMhVybRtg+CFMMjU7zlxPIu1jDv1z6lRwW3s/Yttnap/CbDd/o6u+dgOYeKkLVIx fgdGVM2L+7DcX8498dfhrqtDkx1LDdf0ekXAxR/WhTR+IOMBV8qpiKpyYttz2Tpe2EMR jDwd/EonfgewX5SFi3AuNyi9SxztG0+aDOs34=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=arv4tivL4gPbI1xkTr+ZccD/bwOaKSGidk2uPugfjgrYtWK137DhAmSWaihrfAQ/hr B9SybSkE68BPdL4c+UiKCSa359+b+z0jdUy5gqr0PU1zgtFDVwV29z2rscXuKbAi4WNO uAMCjhVcLI5kzgNYxuXjGEKtjO71e5Q17AJqg=
- References: <20090730111514.G43TO.847267.root (at) web01-winn.ispmail.private.ntl.com> <BAY138-W1624F04359A3E5D12F19749F130 (at) phx.gbl>
Wouldn't it be better on the secondary server(s) to put a conditional
statement in the alert rules that if the primary server is online not
to alert?
I'm pretty sure the rules can handle that.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:32 AM, T.J. Yang<tj_yang (at) hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:15:14 +0100
>> From: j.sansford (at) ntlworld.com
>> To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
>> Subject: [hobbit] Intelligent alerting across multiple servers?
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> We have 3 Xymon servers communicating together and I have noticed they are
>> clever enough to communicate enable/disables across the board. For example
>> if I was to disable a check on the gui from one xymon server it will
>> communicate this with the other 2 and blue them out automatically.
>
> I have a two servers setting for redunancy.
> This is a new feature to me as a hobbit 4.2.0 user, which version are you
> using ?
>
> for blue(maintenance mode) records cloning from one server to the other, we
> need to dump the blue records on primary and rsync the blue records to
> secondary and finally reimport blue records into secondary.
>
>
>> I was wondering if there is something similar for the alerts? We have 3
>> xymons for redundancy however as far as I can tell if I set up the alerts
>> config on all 3 then we are going to get 3x identical alerts. Is there any
>> way they can talk to each other and only send out one?
>
> To avoid alert duplication from secondary servers with hobbit 4.2.0 , we
> need to write a perl script to check primary from secondary. if primary has
> outage of network connection or hobbit server is down then we enable alert
> module of secondary hobbbit server. at any given time only one hobbit server
> is allowed to send out alerts.
>
> So are you configuring all your hobbit clients to send message to all three
> servers ?
> This not a concern for a LAN setting but it may become a problem if the
> deployment is at the scale of thousands of clients and sending message
> across WAN the has smaller wan pipe.
>
>
> tj
>
>> Many thanks
>> James
>>
>> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
>> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>>
>>
>
>
> ________________________________
> Bing™ brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it
> now.