[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] scalability of hobbit/xymon ?
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] scalability of hobbit/xymon ?
- From: Nicolas <nico (at) crysto.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:23:54 +0200
- Thread-index: Acn/0CN2VP4CnhEawUqJGywEqtCz/AAILqi3
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] scalability of hobbit/xymon ?
- User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.0.0.071130
Sorry a bug in my mail client. :-(
On 08/07/09 mercredi 8 15:29, "Nicolas" <nico (at) crysto.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In my company, we are currently monitoring ~7000 devices (unix, microsoft,
> network, firewall, storage) in 13 datacenters in different countries (Spain,
> Italy, Germany, Belgium, France, Amsterdam, Belgium, UK).
>
> The architecture is simple: one hobbit cluster using Heartbeat in each
> datacenter (= 13 clusters) reporting to a central cluster by bbproxy and some
> custom scripts to concatenate/consolidate the bb-hosts files correctly.
>
> My question is for the future, we need to support 20 000 devices and i would
> like to know if hobbit is able to do that. (scalability).
> Indeed, my company doesn¹t trust that it¹s possible, and they want to move to
> HP BSM or EMC Smarts .... :-(
>
> Any experience about that is welcome.
>
> Regards,
> Nico
>
>