[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Multiple Hobbit server clusters
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Multiple Hobbit server clusters
- From: <j.sansford (at) ntlworld.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 8:39:51 +0100
- Cc: Ralph Mitchell <ralphmitchell (at) gmail.com>
- Sensitivity: Normal
Oooh, interesting. Although I'm not entirely sure this is what I need.
The reason why we wish to have a hobbit (sorry, xymon..I'm still used to the old name!) in each data centre is in case our inter-data centre links go down.
For example, currently we only have a xymon server at site B. If the link between A and B went down, we would suddenly have no visibility of any clients in site A. Therefore we wish to have xymon servers in site A, B and C monitoring local clients to that data centre. The issue is that we do not want to have to view 3 separate xymon server pages to see the status overall, hence why I wan't all three to communicate to each other. So Xymon A can send A results to B and C, Xymon B can send B results to A and C etc.
Is this possible? I can't immediately see a way to do this with a proxy, as it just seems to be adding another layer, that would still have to send out results to all 3 xymons (so brings me back to the original situation of having each client send to all 3 xymons anyway, which is something we don't really want to do).
Or have I mis-interpreted the use of the proxy?
Ta!
James
---- Ralph Mitchell <ralphmitchell (at) gmail.com> wrote:
> You might want to take a look at the bbproxy man page:
> http://192.168.1.50/xymon/help/manpages/man8/bbproxy.8.html
>
> <http://192.168.1.50/xymon/help/manpages/man8/bbproxy.8.html>I haven't used
> it myself, but I'm sure others here have.
>
> If you have the option of setting up a private network between the 3 hobbit
> servers, you ought to be able to push the bbproxy output over it, thereby
> keeping all the hobbit traffic off your main network. Or I could be all wet
> - I have no idea if that would work... :)
>
> Ralph Mitchell
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 2:42 PM, James <j.sansford (at) ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > We have a bit of a predicament at my work and I am hoping the knowledge of
> > this mailing list can help out! I shall explain what we have / need and
> > hopefully there shall be a solution :)
> >
> > We currently have 3 data centres, and would like a hobbit server in each.
> > Our design is to have all servers in one data centre communicating with the
> > hobbit within that data centre. We would then want the hobbit servers to
> > communicate between each other to share the knowledge of the tests so each
> > hobbit has a full view of all 3 data centres.
> >
> > I have currently configured each hobbit to have knowledge of the others by
> > changing BBDISP to 0.0.0.0 and BBDISPLAYS to the 3 hobbit server IP's. I
> > have then configured all our clients to talk only to the the hobbit within
> > the local data centre.
> >
> > So far I have observed that any server side test replicates fine across all
> > hobbits, however it seems for any client side scripts that are run, that
> > only the hobbit the client reports to will get the data and wont share it
> > with the other two. We don't want to have to configure each client to talk
> > to all 3 hobbits as this will increase the network chatter.
> >
> > Hopefully I've explained that well enough, does this make sense and is
> > there a way around it?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance for your time,
> > James.
> >