[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Xymon roadmap
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Xymon roadmap
- From: Stef Coene <stef.coene (at) docum.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:55:24 +0200
- References: <7E7681A7C4CE48A09241681926CAE747 (at) behemoth> <9F4B8A70C3E2D142AF209DB53DBC1D5107D986D6 (at) MUN2WSP05011.global.pioneer.com> <BAY138-W6629A83E12A25F8778EF89F370 (at) phx.gbl>
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.10
On Wednesday 24 June 2009, T.J. Yang wrote:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> > Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:18:13 +0200
> > From: Padraig.Lennon (at) pioneerinvestments.com
> > To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> > Subject: RE: [hobbit] Hobbit developer access.
> >
> > This brings up a good point.. We use Xymon extensively at my company but
> > I'm worried about the lack of a long term outlook for the project.
>
> Same here in regard of xymon deployment. But what I am worry about is that
> we still don't have a team of developers to develop xymon(hobbit).
> we(including me ;) are still relying solely on henrik's free development
> effort.
There was a discussion when Henrik was out for a few weeks. And it was clear
that there were enough volunteers (including me) to take over the
development. Some time later, Henrik switched to a (little) more open
development with svn where also other people had commit access.
Anyway, when development stops. I have to take over delopment because we
integrade xymon in our monitoring solution.
The few patches I proposed were (almost) all accepted. So Henrik is very open
to input from other developers.
Stef