[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [hobbit] Bb-network.log Host fileserver appears twice in bb-hosts! This may cause strange results

That's because you have to use a slightly different name for fileserver
name. change it to ftpfileserver and you'll not going to get that error
message again.
2009-05-27 09:56:21 Host fileserver appears twice in bb-hosts! This may
cause strange results
 
camelia


 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: William Ottley [mailto:wottley (at) cmicanada.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 9:58 AM
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: Re: [hobbit] Bb-network.log Host fileserver appears twice in
bb-hosts! This may cause strange results
 
I tired that, same error:

page services Services
group-compress <H3><I>Services:</I></H3>
group-only http|ftp  <font size="+1">Web</font>
0.0.0.0 fileserver       # noconn http://fileserver/ ftp

2009-05-27 09:56:21 Host fileserver appears twice in bb-hosts! This may
cause strange results





On 27/05/09 9:39 AM, "Chris.Morris (at) RWEsystemsUK.com"
<Chris.Morris (at) RWEsystemsUK.com> wrote:
Does your second entry for fileserver have 0.0.0.0 as the ip address?

 
  _____  

From: William Ottley  [mailto:wottley (at) cmicanada.com] 
Sent: 27 May 2009  14:35
To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Subject: [hobbit] Bb-network.log  Host fileserver appears twice in
bb-hosts! This may cause strange  results

 
 
Hi all, sorry for not responding sooner, I was  away.
Thanks Michael and Ralph for trying to help me.

I tried the  suggestion:  group-only, but I get the same  error:
bb-network.log:
        2009-04-27  11:33:48 Host fileserver appears twice in bb-hosts!
This may cause strange  results

Here's my bb-hosts file:
 

page servers Servers
group-compress  <H3><I>Windows:</I></H3>
xx.xx.xx.xx fileserver        #

page services  Services
group-compress  <H3><I>Services:</I></H3>
group-only http|ftp   <font size="+1">http Ftp</font>
xx.xx.xx.xx fileserver        # noconn http://fileserver/ ftp


does anyone  know why?

thanks!

-- 
This message has been scanned for dangerous content by MailScanner
<http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is believed to be clean.