[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [hobbit] xymon ready to replace bb?
- To: <hobbit (at) hswn.dk>
- Subject: RE: [hobbit] xymon ready to replace bb?
- From: "Kip, D. - GDI/SNB" <d.kip (at) gdi.minjus.nl>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:26:51 +0100
- References: <49CAE37B.6070002 (at) tmsusa.com> <200903262325.53879.stef.coene (at) docum.org> <20090326225334.73990 (at) gmx.net> <997a524e0903261631o4741829fj2e1b1829eb199342 (at) mail.gmail.com> <1238110786.22769.367.camel (at) mcdonalddj-dc.austin-energy.net>
- Thread-index: AcmubCZDF7iEk8aURfSYw1MfrDB4iwAOMpEw
- Thread-topic: [hobbit] xymon ready to replace bb?
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: McDonald, Dan [mailto:Dan.McDonald (at) austinenergy.com]
Verzonden: vrijdag 27 maart 2009 0:40
Aan: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
Onderwerp: Re: [hobbit] xymon ready to replace bb?
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 18:31 -0500, Ralph Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Malcolm Hunter
> <malcolm.hunter (at) gmx.co.uk> wrote:
> > The other (the slave one) first checks the status of the
> other server (a
> > simpel wget of the status page can be enough) and only sends
> out the alert
> > if
> > this page is not green.
Why not point the master's client to the slave, and if bbd goes
red/purple, then take over....
Do you have a sample configuration for this? I'd be interested...