Re: [hobbit] Different Tests for different clients: but same localclient.cfg

[William Ottley <wottley (at) cmicanada.com>]

I found Ghost report, but there aren¹t any clients on there.
Is there a configuration file I need to modify to get them on there?




On 19/03/09 4:30 PM, "Ralph Mitchell" <ralphmitchell (at) gmail.com> wrote:

> There should be a "ghost report" entry in the Reports drop down menu on any of
> your Xymon web pages.
> 
> Ralph Mitchell
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:22 PM, William Ottley <wottley (at) cmicanada.com> wrote:
>> Ahhh ok, I can look into that. But ummm :$ ³ghosts report²? Sorry not to sure
>> where that is...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/19/09 4:18 PM, "Hubbard, Greg L" <greg.hubbard (at) eds.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Your Mac client is probably not communicating correctly with the Hobbit
>>> server on your Solaris 10 machine.  Check your ghosts report to see if you
>>> have a naming mismatch between your bb-hosts file and what the Darwin client
>>> is sending.  If there is a mismatch, you either fix it at the client (with a
>>> startup parameter for the bbclient process) or at the server end with a
>>> CLIENT tag in the bb-hosts file.  (Or something like that, I am working from
>>> memory).
>>>  
>>> GLH
>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>>  From: William Ottley  [mailto:wottley (at) cmicanada.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 3:09  PM
>>>> To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
>>>> Subject: [hobbit] Different Tests  for different clients: but same
>>>> localclient.cfg
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> I compiled the client for solaris 10  and for the mac OSX.
>>>> They have been added to the bbhosts file on the hobbit  server.
>>>> They both have the same localclient.cfg, pointing to the hobbit  server.
>>>> 
>>>> I¹m trying to get all the tests to show up.
>>>> But only some  of them do so. What needs to be changed to do so?
>>>> 
>>>> Solaris10:  Bbd,  conn, cpu,  disk, files, http,  info,  memory,  msgs,
>>>>   ports,   procs,  trends
>>>> OSX:    conn,  info, trends
>>>> 
>>>> The mac has almost no tests on it: is this because the  server isn¹t
>>>> talking to the client?
>>>> 
>>>> Any help would be  appreciated.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> Will
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 19/03/09 2:38 PM, "Taylor  Lewick" <tlewick (at) tradebotsystems.com>  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>> Is anyone doing anything to be alerted on a per Core  basis instead of
>>>>> overall CPU.  This would apply to both Linux and  Windows, under windows
>>>>> using the bbwin  client?
>> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.