netiquette (was: RE: [hobbit] BBWIN 64 Bit)

[Anna Jonna Armannsdottir <annaj (at) hi.is>]

On miÃ, 2009-03-04 at 18:33 +0000, Benedikt Kristinsson wrote:
> Could you please include the message you are responding to so we know
> what you actually are responding to?

[KLIP]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MFisher (at) hra.com [mailto:MFisher (at) hra.com]
> Sent: Wed 4.3.2009 17:16
> To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
> Subject: RE: [hobbit] BBWIN 64 Bit
>  
> I have a static IP address specified but DNS is also resolving
> 

It is actually very refreshing to read messages that are terse, 
exact and to the point. There was absolutely no need for the user 
to resend all the messages that already have been sent in this thread 
and that may or may not have been relevant to the users text. 

It is simply common sense to cut away irrelevant sections of the 
previous messages, and to include only the parts that are relevant 
to ones own message. 

Also what does the following type of posting actually do for the
reader: 

A: Because people read from top to bottom.
Q: Why is top posting bad?

Best regards, 
-- 
Kindest Regards, Anna Jonna ÃrmannsdÃttir,       %&   A: Because people read from top to bottom.
Unix System Aministration, Computing Services,   %&   Q: Why is top posting bad?
University of Iceland.