[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Question on Hobbitping
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Question on Hobbitping
- From: Asif Iqbal <vadud3 (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:50:26 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AxXAv0cb4DnCTaPTl3451MXM9gQrcsKsxKHKdkU5bxk=; b=RtKXUZ+bni7vFcgBFXfpgFbPMoCGQUSWdX9gSLWNnTEiUPP1dQfVaZbHdYgZJ5I6Ro SrPh7tRaK0Q8jInYVxwDB/SaFv4rHKTG7zxCmbdGTCfTaBX0HvzC49+4sqEGubys+MVr 0XRC3Wo9pj0RViXUQJ6hkuxUXgYbx778pV+9o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kMrArEMLRRTE4E7ujMMw1qrqZMKFJaxrY3CRvuUWlZN/mDQWgJSJ1lYvLlZa4ysNe5 oc1HU1EeHL7hFgGtqNIAh1zpD2DuNFv2BIchq3wT4iIIelPaNshctAAWh6NotENmMg1C PTgNEBo7Blp0XVQPnx466WXG6nnKlCjedv0OU=
- References: <auto-001027336325 (at) mailfe12.swip.net> <20090226095001.GE2957 (at) osiris.hswn.dk> <62B27DCC50CB48A8BF9C6BB38B43FBEA (at) jasonsdell>
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Jason Hand <jason (at) hands4christ.org> wrote:
> I saw a couple of threads on this issue but I'm not clear what the best
> solution is. When I run a ping to a given host on the same network I see
> the response in very small ms response times but Hobbit 4.2 reports that
> they are from 20ms to 40ms. Another poster commented:
>
> "It looks like the delays are coming from the usleep line in send_ping();
> this looks like it was put in there to do some network/cpu throttling,
> which would definitely make the bbtest-net duration longer, but I'm not
> sure yet why it is affecting the icmp return times.
>
> Running hobbitping with the flag "--max-pps=10000000" seems to fix
> things."
>
> My question is -- Where do you add that flag?
>
> Also, would it be advantageous to run fping instead of Hobbitping? How many
> of you are running fping instead of Hobbitping and why did you choose that?
Use fping. Most of us I think. Same reason why you are going to choose
it. It is not
production ready. Something much better is coming with Xymon 4.3 per Henrik.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>
>
--
Asif Iqbal
PGP Key: 0xE62693C5 KeyServer: pgp.mit.edu
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?