[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Distro
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Distro
- From: Michael Osburn <michael.osburn (at) echostar.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:18:23 -0700
- References: <8A82C7A8DFD13048B6717BBFA72CF57402A5B9B8 (at) prmsdcex01.premier.local> <200902031829.16986.bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net>
On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 18:29 +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 February 2009 13:19:24 Neil Franken wrote:
> > Hi Guys
> >
> > I tested XyMon on Ubuntu 7.1 and it was not too difficult to install. We
> > are now ready to deploy XyMon into production so I am looking at which
> > Distribution XyMon is the easiest to install and maintain. Getting
> > things to run on Ubuntu was not a major issue but if there is a easier
> > distro I would like to use it for now.
> >
>
> IMHO, what distribution is easiest to install on is not the best factor to
> base your decision for a long-term server.
>
> Either way, most distros are quite easy to get Hobbit or Xymon running on,
> e.g. Mandriva ships Hobbit (soon Xymon), and I buid the packages for
> RHEL/Centos as well:
>
>
> http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/
>
> (e.g.:
> http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/hobbit/i386/
> http://staff.telkomsa.net/packages/rhel5/hobbit/noarch/
> )
>
> I guess you mean Ubuntu 7.10. I can't remember which are "LTS" releases, but
> 7.10 is probably already quite a fair way into the support lifetime of the
> distro (compared to say, RHEL5/CentOS5 or Debian).
>
If you want LTS, go with Ubuntu 8.04. This has a 5 year support
promise.
> Regards,
> Buchan
>
> To unsubscribe from the hobbit list, send an e-mail to
> hobbit-unsubscribe (at) hswn.dk
>
>