[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Suitability for bb replacement in large enterprise
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Suitability for bb replacement in large enterprise
- From: Dominique Frise <dominique.frise (at) unil.ch>
- Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:46:14 +0100
- References: <493AEDCE.9060107 (at) tmsusa.com>
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080531)
Joe Sloan wrote:
Hello list,
I learned about hobbit a couple years back, and I've been using it in
some small shops, but I'm hoping to be able to deploy it for my main
employer.
At my day job, we've been using the old big brother 1.9e plus bbgen-3.5
to monitor hundreds of unix and windows servers spread across 2 data
centers. Id like to move to hobbit, but it is important that it be able
to do what bb does. For the most part it is better than bb, but I have 2
specific areas of concern:
1. snmp traps: Our netcool ticketing system relies on snmp traps from
big brother whenever there is a significant event.
We use the elegant method from Andy Farrior :
http://cerebro.victoriacollege.edu/hobbit-trap.html
Dominique
UNIL - University of Lausanne