[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] IPv6
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] IPv6
- From: "David A. Bandel" <david.bandel (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 21:26:52 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=PuVLVpDpKvjNOa2fhhsvernUDiXtfE7so1BS0rhhGR4=; b=iLAssC1ulT3af9Vf4ctVYymO2syLXCGo0kGP4u0XRzs2yhYgINHZSemEwM9nYlOL0g ZDzOtxRhFrsLlmvusD8qSEqeBKg4lcztpl/coGVQvYdUVjJR1q8R1/LguEaG23E0Hetj Pi4uYKdbVs1/dKWhhdQhmdPaMQRowJFdiyAFM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=QoeNdS/SxRWNu2Wtr1/95YiiyxBXCua/BKbcs1Jnfz66N8dxh7GC/ZZKEAvcRjoSZo o5u4vA58Kde38O+BWKvumwK8f+kShiqBNomQF2VDYZQmOq28GMiNQPt70fMNDCkdsJZD WoRsWP2NtwVpRNgRXcnrfhcmRja7R+oi2gRX8=
- References: <ea6cc0c70811281053n3c27f49fpf78fd2b800a52bf5 (at) mail.gmail.com> <gh1lg0$slr$5 (at) voodoo.hswn.dk>
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Henrik Størner <henrik (at) hswn.dk> wrote:
> In <ea6cc0c70811281053n3c27f49fpf78fd2b800a52bf5 (at) mail.gmail.com> "David A. Bandel" <david.bandel (at) gmail.com> writes:
>
>>Searched the archives and found a few IPv6 inquiries, but only that
>>there are no plans to support it. While I'm not a programmer, I
>>suspect it would actually be fairly simple to implement (please
>>correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> It's not entirely trivial, but it can be done (of course). The
> actual changes needed to "talk" IPv6 in the network service tests
> is probably not a whole lot; may real concern is going through all
> of the places throughout Xymon where the code assumes that an IP-
> address looks like "1.2.3.4".
>
>
>>This is starting to become a priority for me. I need to monitor my
>>ssh servers, but they all only respond now to ipv6, so I can't :-(.
>
> It is moving up on my priority list as well - it seems that IPv6 is
> (finally) seeing some real adoption. It won't be in the next version,
> but probably the one after that.
>
Thanx, Henrik, as long as it's on the map, I'll wait.
David A. Bandel
--
Focus on the dream, not the competition.
- Nemesis Air Racing Team motto