[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Route Question
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Route Question
- From: "Geoff Hallford" <geoff.hallford (at) gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 20:20:34 -0500
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=36WfndK7dThVas6MWTBxAQAyQjvymWa47T+M15GOKgQ=; b=XRZH692UonhBkV/rNyyD4hlRJy9XbJAga4rwOpRXG49Nd9lBW+zG8VzjnNAGpR3oaq FqBvMcpbq9ymnwNbavgZxTK3Pfm79El0YAeTIQftim7DF5FYwTTlC/oodrOLWSkzEn01 8iCBjcBHjIIQbDYM+KcqaWp5feruHH+3PFpfc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=Yvdz5+s+Gh/3yIRrSStWw3reEmBSctnOPeKx13IGohZ0xuwEC4jH9Eu6fFHKLepIfW GtQuy3WJKn/nxkynltTmF7wzNy4pacHUi+eVREX/atsE0/ev2XA4rvkblHRtWbnKxO0e lJA/5VooybJAembatiEt6A0AOnoGQ0rEfIlzQ=
- References: <78ca5ea20812011041j6749bcc2mfe977f2087d351ea (at) mail.gmail.com> <961092e10812011047y68ecef1dw30344b7f227b61fa (at) mail.gmail.com> <78ca5ea20812011114p543aed2dsa2daea94c400cb7c (at) mail.gmail.com>
It works as you thought and I hoped. Thanks. It will chain.
'Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded.' --Yogi Berra
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Geoff Hallford <geoff.hallford (at) gmail.com>wrote:
> Perfect, thanks. I just need someone's confirmation. I will disable
> alerting later Today and give it a shot. I will let the list know, so that
> other can know as well.
>
> I think that should probably be added to the bb-hosts man page for the
> "route:" tag, since it doesn't explain that this can work and is much better
> to do.
>
> Geoff.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Josh Luthman <josh (at) imaginenetworksllc.com>wrote:
>
>> My money says it would work as expected. To be sure simply set a static
>> arp entry for 10.30.30.30, switch2 and 10.20.20.20, rtr1. You should see
>> the router go red and the switch go yellow.
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
>> --- Henry Spencer
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Geoff Hallford <geoff.hallford (at) gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Does anyone know if the route tag in bb-hosts "chains"? I am trying to
>>> configure the route dependencies the best way possible. Would this work?
>>>
>>> Example:
>>> -----------------------------
>>> Host is HostA and the path to HostA is RTR1,STCH2,RTR3.
>>>
>>> bb-hosts Example (What I want to do):
>>> -----------------------------
>>> 10.20.20.21 HOBBIT
>>> 10.20.20.20 RTR1
>>> 10.30.30.30 SWCH2 route:RTR1
>>> 10.40.40.40 RTR3 route:SWCH2
>>> 10.40.40.41 HostA route:RTR3
>>>
>>> So that if say SWCH2 goes down, I won't get alerts for RTR3 or HostA
>>> (because the dependency "chains" from RTR3, to SWCH2 ....
>>>
>>> OR, do I have to do it like the following (whole path, each time):
>>>
>>> bb-hosts Example (What I don't really want to do but should work no
>>> matter what):
>>> -----------------------------
>>> 10.20.20.21 HOBBIT
>>> 10.20.20.20 RTR1
>>> 10.30.30.30 SWCH2 route:RTR1
>>> 10.40.40.40 RTR3 route:RTR1,SWCH2
>>> 10.40.40.41 HostA route:RTR1,SWCH2,RTR3
>>>
>>> Thanks! I don't have a test network device to try this, which is why I am
>>> asking.
>>>
>>> Geoff Hallford
>>>
>>> 'Nobody goes there anymore. It's too crowded.' --Yogi Berra
>>>
>>
>>
>