[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Vigilante releases (was: RRDs created, never updated)
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Vigilante releases (was: RRDs created, never updated)
- From: Henrik "Størner" <henrik (at) hswn.dk>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 21:56:21 +0000 (UTC)
- Cc: <tj_yang (at) hotmail.com>
- Newsgroups: lists.hobbit
- Organization: Linux Users Inc.
- References: <35a89cde0811051320p71dd4494nf25b3b022a001d86 (at) mail.gmail.com> <35a89cde0811051320p71dd4494nf25b3b022a001d86 (at) mail.gmail.com> <4912109D.2050701 (at) wi.rr.com> <35a89cde0811051348s2a52ba69l53453cf8d6912aa6 (at) mail.gmail.com> <491216E0.4060507 (at) wi.rr.com> <35a89cde0811051402gc8b1c7cg71dc604552c6bb29 (at) mail.gmail.com> <49121A36.2050601 (at) wi.rr.com> <49121FC4.4010707 (at) shadowsoft.com> <BAY138-DS1620B45379321618FC0139F1F0 (at) phx.gbl>
- User-agent: nn/6.7.3
OK, I'm not the type who gets offended easily, but this did make my
blood pressure go up a bit:
In <BAY138-DS1620B45379321618FC0139F1F0 (at) phx.gbl> "T.J. Yang" <tj_yang (at) hotmail.com> writes:
>> Jon Boede wrote:
>
>>Out of random curiosity... why hasn't anybody applied the all in one =
>>patch and put a hobbit 4.2.1 or something up on SourceForge??
>done.
>1. 4.2.1 tar ball is here:
[snip]
>2. 4.2.1 Readme file.
[snip]
TJ, I hope You did this with the best of intentions. But I'm really
offended that You did it without at least telling me about it first.
My personal e-mail address is well known, and dropping me a mail
first would have been the polite thing to do. If You'd done that,
such a release could have been done quickly with my "official"
blessing.
Instead, You've made me angry and created a mess - there's now one
more place where some random version of Hobbit can be found. And on
top of it all You've given it the look of an official patch by
putting a "4.2.1" label on it.
All I'm asking for is that all of you *think* about what you do.
If you're frustrated about the next release not arriving, do
something to move it forward - i.e. grab the current source-trunk
from the Subversion archive, use it and send bug reports. Or
patches. Or write docs.
Henrik (in a rather frustrated mood)