[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] nagios vs hobbit
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] nagios vs hobbit
- From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne (at) staff.telkomsa.net>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:05:53 +0200
- Cc: Shawn Heisey <hobbit (at) elyograg.org>
- References: <1224113193.30960.36.camel (at) newtoy.homelan> <48F7411F.3070107 (at) elyograg.org>
- User-agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.27-desktop-0.rc8.2mnb; KDE/4.1.2; x86_64; ; )
On Thursday 16 October 2008 15:26:55 Shawn Heisey wrote:
> Geoff Steer wrote:
> > Every time I have to add a new monitor or get asked to graph something,
> > I keep thinking 'This would be so much easier with hobbit!'
>
> At my job, we're using two primary tools for network monitoring - Hobbit
> and OpenNMS. Hobbit is primarily for system monitoring, and OpenNMS for
> network monitoring.
You mean for SNMP polling?
<plug>Have you tried devmon</plug>
[...]
> If I put enough work into OpenNMS, it would be able to replace Hobbit
> and leave it in the dust, but I don't have any reason to spend the time.
What features specifically would you use from OpenNMS (and aren't available
with Hobbit+devmon?).
(I haven't gotten around to trying OpenNMS, though I have been meaning to for
some time - probably spent most of that time on improving devmon).
Regards,
Buchan