[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [hobbit] Debian Packaging
- To: hobbit (at) hswn.dk
- Subject: Re: [hobbit] Debian Packaging
- From: Henrik Stoerner <henrik (at) hswn.dk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 05:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
- Newsgroups: lists.hobbit
- Organization: Linux Users Inc.
- References: <48F513CF.9090401 (at) elyograg.org>
- User-agent: nn/6.7.3
In <48F513CF.9090401 (at) elyograg.org> Shawn Heisey <elyograg (at) elyograg.org> writes:
>I haven't done an in-depth study, but I've noticed that most of what's
>in the allinone patch is not included in this packaging effort. When I
>apply the allinone patch against the source tree after debian/rules
>applies its patches, only two of the patches fail to apply - the one for
>./hobbitd/rrd/do_ncv.c is already applied, and the one for
>./hobbitd/wwwfiles/menu/menu_items.js.DIST fails because this file
>doesn't exist. In fact, the enture hobbitd/wwwfiles/menu directory is
>empty.
>For my production server, I have taken the source package and applied
>the allinone and bbwin patches to it, but now I am wondering if that was
>a good idea. Is the allinone patch omitted from the debian package for
>a good reason? Why is that menu directory empty?
As I recall, the Debian package uses a different solution for creating
the menu - which is probably why the "menu" directory is empty.
Regards,
Henrik